Patterns of Argumentation Strategies across Topics
This paper presents an analysis of argumentation strategies in news editorials within and across topics. Given nearly 29,000 argumentative editorials from the New York Times, we develop two machine learning models, one for determining an editorial{'}s topic, and one for identifying evidence types in the editorial. Based on the distribution and structure of the identified types, we analyze the usage patterns of argumentation strategies among 12 different topics. We detect several common patterns that provide insights into the manifestation of argumentation strategies. Also, our experiments reveal clear correlations between the topics and the detected patterns.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Argument MiningBIG-bench Machine LearningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
What Changed Your Mind: The Roles of Dynamic Topics and Discourse in Argumentation Process
In our world with full of uncertainty, debates and argumentation contribute to the progress of science and society. Despite of the increasing attention to characterize human arguments, most progress made so far focus on …
PersuasivenessArgumentation Synthesis following Rhetorical Strategies
Persuasion is rarely achieved through a loose set of arguments alone. Rather, an effective delivery of arguments follows a rhetorical strategy, combining logical reasoning with appeals to ethics and emotion. We argue tha…
Argument MiningEthicsLogical ReasoningTruthStance: An Annotated Dataset of Conversations on Truth Social
Argument mining and stance detection are central to understanding how opinions are formed and contested in online discourse. However, most publicly available resources focus on mainstream platforms such as Twitter and Re…
Stance DetectionArgument MiningSAD: A Large-Scale Strategic Argumentative Dialogue Dataset
Argumentation generation has attracted substantial research interest due to its central role in human reasoning and decision-making. However, most existing argumentative corpora focus on non-interactive, single-turn sett…
ConQRet: Benchmarking Fine-Grained Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Argumentation with LLM Judges
Computational argumentation, which involves generating answers or summaries for controversial topics like abortion bans and vaccination, has become increasingly important in today's polarized environment. Sophisticated L…
BenchmarkingRetrievalRetrieval-augmented Generation