Personality Requires Struggle: Three Regimes of the Baldwin Effect in Neuroevolved Chess Agents
Can lifetime learning expand behavioral diversity over evolutionary time, rather than collapsing it? Prior theory predicts that plasticity reduces variance by buffering organisms against environmental noise. We test this in a competitive domain: chess agents with eight NEAT-evolved neural modules, Hebbian within-game plasticity, and a desirability-domain signal chain with imagination. Across 10~seeds per Hebbian condition, a variance crossover emerges: Hebbian ON starts with lower cross-seed variance than OFF, then surpasses it at generation~34. The crossover trend is monotonic (\r{ho} = 0.91, p < 10^{-6): plasticity's effect on behavioral variance reverses over evolutionary time, initially compressing diversity (consistent with prior predictions) then expanding it as evolved Perception differences are amplified through imagination -- a feedback loop that mutation alone cannot sustain. The result is structured behavioral divergence: evolved agents select different moves on the same positions (62\% disagreement), develop distinct opening repertoires, piece preferences, and game lengths. These are not different sampling policies -- they are reproducible behavioral signatures (ICC > 0.8) with interpretable signal chain configurations. Three regimes appear depending on opponent type: exploration (Hebbian ON, heterogeneous opponent), lottery (Hebbian OFF, elitism lock-in), and transparent (same-model opponent, brain self-erasure). The transparent regime generates a falsifiable prediction: self-play systems may systematically suppress behavioral diversity by eliminating the heterogeneity that personality requires. \textbf{Keywords: Baldwin Effect, neuroevolution, NEAT, Hebbian learning, chess, cognitive architecture, personality emergence, imagination
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
A Fresh Look at Lamarckian Evolution and the Baldwin Effect
Baldwinian and Lamarckian evolution have existed for a long time in evolutionary algorithms (EAs) without ever dominating the academic literature or practical applications. In this work, we use modern empirical and theor…
Meta-Learning by the Baldwin Effect
The scope of the Baldwin effect was recently called into question by two papers that closely examined the seminal work of Hinton and Nowlan. To this date there has been no demonstration of its necessity in empirically ch…
Meta-LearningReinforcement LearningStructured Personality Control and Adaptation for LLM Agents
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly shaping human-computer interaction (HCI), from personalized assistants to social simulations. Beyond language competence, researchers are exploring whether LLMs can exhibit h…
Cooperation as well as learning: A commentary on 'How learning can guide evolution' by Hinton and Nowlan
According to the Baldwin Effect learning can guide evolution. This does not suppose that information about what has been learned is transferred back into the genetic code: in the Baldwin Effect complex multi-gene charact…
Evolutionary Optimization of Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Advancing Generalizability by the Baldwin Effect
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are at the forefront of scientific machine learning, making possible the creation of machine intelligence that is cognizant of physical laws and able to accurately simulate them. …
Meta-Learning