paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

PIPCFR: Pseudo-outcome Imputation with Post-treatment Variables for Individual Treatment Effect Estimation

2025-12-21 · Zichuan Lin, Xiaokai Huang, Jiate Liu, Yuxuan Han, Jia Chen, Xiapeng Wu, Deheng Ye arxiv

The estimation of individual treatment effects (ITE) focuses on predicting the outcome changes that result from a change in treatment. A fundamental challenge in observational data is that while we need to infer outcome differences under alternative treatments, we can only observe each individual's outcome under a single treatment. Existing approaches address this limitation either by training with inferred pseudo-outcomes or by creating matched instance pairs. However, recent work has largely overlooked the potential impact of post-treatment variables on the outcome. This oversight prevents existing methods from fully capturing outcome variability, resulting in increased variance in counterfactual predictions. This paper introduces Pseudo-outcome Imputation with Post-treatment Variables for Counterfactual Regression (PIPCFR), a novel approach that incorporates post-treatment variables to improve pseudo-outcome imputation. We analyze the challenges inherent in utilizing post-treatment variables and establish a novel theoretical bound for ITE risk that explicitly connects post-treatment variables to ITE estimation accuracy. Unlike existing methods that ignore these variables or impose restrictive assumptions, PIPCFR learns effective representations that preserve informative components while mitigating bias. Empirical evaluations on both real-world and simulated datasets demonstrate that PIPCFR achieves significantly lower ITE errors compared to existing methods.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2512.18737

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

CATE Estimation With Potential Outcome Imputation From Local Regression

2023-11-07 · Ahmed Aloui, Juncheng Dong, Cat P. Le, Vahid Tarokh

One of the most significant challenges in Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) estimation is the statistical discrepancy between distinct treatment groups. To address this issue, we propose a model-agnostic data a…

Contrastive LearningcounterfactualData AugmentationImputation+1

Simultaneous Measurement Imputation and Outcome Prediction for Achilles Tendon Rupture Rehabilitation

2018-09-08 · Charles Hamesse, Ruibo Tu, Paul Ackermann, Hedvig Kjellström 외

Achilles Tendon Rupture (ATR) is one of the typical soft tissue injuries. Rehabilitation after such a musculoskeletal injury remains a prolonged process with a very variable outcome. Accurately predicting rehabilitation …

Imputation

To Impute or not to Impute? Missing Data in Treatment Effect Estimation

2022-02-04 · Jeroen Berrevoets, Fergus Imrie, Trent Kyono, James Jordon 외

Missing data is a systemic problem in practical scenarios that causes noise and bias when estimating treatment effects. This makes treatment effect estimation from data with missingness a particularly tricky endeavour. A…

Imputation

PairNet: Training with Observed Pairs to Estimate Individual Treatment Effect

2024-06-06 · Lokesh Nagalapatti, Pranava Singhal, Avishek Ghosh, Sunita Sarawagi

Given a dataset of individuals each described by a covariate vector, a treatment, and an observed outcome on the treatment, the goal of the individual treatment effect (ITE) estimation task is to predict outcome changes …

Bayesian X-Learner: Calibrated Posterior Inference for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects under Heavy-Tailed Outcomes

2026-04-30 · Eichi Uehara arxiv

Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) estimation in practice demands three properties simultaneously: heterogeneous effects $τ(x)$, calibrated uncertainty over them, and robustness to the heavy tails that contamina…