paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Policy-Invisible Violations in LLM-Based Agents

2026-04-14 · Jie Wu, Ming Gong arxiv

LLM-based agents can execute actions that are syntactically valid, user-sanctioned, and semantically appropriate, yet still violate organizational policy because the facts needed for correct policy judgment are hidden at decision time. We call this failure mode policy-invisible violations: cases in which compliance depends on entity attributes, contextual state, or session history absent from the agent's visible context. We present PhantomPolicy, a benchmark spanning eight violation categories with balanced violation and safe-control cases, in which all tool responses contain clean business data without policy metadata. We manually review all 600 model traces produced by five frontier models and evaluate them using human-reviewed trace labels. Manual review changes 32 labels (5.3%) relative to the original case-level annotations, confirming the need for trace-level human review. To demonstrate what world-state-grounded enforcement can achieve under favorable conditions, we introduce Sentinel, an enforcement framework based on counterfactual graph simulation. Sentinel treats every agent action as a proposed mutation to an organizational knowledge graph, performs speculative execution to materialize the post-action world state, and verifies graph-structural invariants to decide Allow/Block/Clarify. Against human-reviewed trace labels, Sentinel substantially outperforms a content-only DLP baseline (68.8% vs. 93.0% accuracy) while maintaining high precision, though it still leaves room for improvement on certain violation categories. These results demonstrate what becomes achievable once policy-relevant world state is made available to the enforcement layer.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2604.12177

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

No Attack Required: Semantic Fuzzing for Specification Violations in Agent Skills

2026-05-13 · Ying Li, Hongbo Wen, Yanju Chen, Hanzhi Liu 외 arxiv

LLM-powered agents can silently delete documents, leak credentials, or transfer funds on a routine user request, not because the agent was attacked, but because the skill it invoked broke its own declared safety rules. W…

Structural Distinguishability of Static and Adaptive Policy Regimes in Agent-Based Regulatory Simulation

2026-06-15 · Roberto Garrone arxiv

Agent-based models are widely used to evaluate policy interventions in complex socio-technical systems, yet many policy-oriented ABMs represent regulation as a fixed scenario parameter. This limits their ability to disti…

Lyapunov Barrier Policy Optimization

2021-03-16 · Harshit Sikchi, Wenxuan Zhou, David Held

Deploying Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents in the real-world require that the agents satisfy safety constraints. Current RL agents explore the environment without considering these constraints, which can lead to damage…

Reinforcement Learning (RL)

AudAgent: Automated Auditing of Privacy Policy Compliance in AI Agents

2025-11-03 · Ye Zheng, Yimin Chen, Yidan Hu arxiv

AI agents can autonomously perform tasks and, often without explicit user consent, collect or disclose users' sensitive local data, which raises serious privacy concerns. Although AI agents' privacy policies describe the…

No Action Without a NOD: A Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Architecture for Reliable Service Agents

2026-05-12 · Zixu Yang, Hang Zheng, Nan Jiang, Zhiyang Tang 외 arxiv

Large language model (LLM) agents have increasingly advanced service applications, such as booking flight tickets. However, these service agents suffer from unreliability in long-horizon tasks, as they often produce poli…