paper-with-me

Papers

Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishing

2026-05-11 · Ruben Laukkonen, Seb Krier, Chloé Bakalar, Shamil Chandaria, Morten Kringelbach, Adam Elwood, Daniel Ford, Fernando Rosas, Maty Bohacek, Matija Franklin, Nenad Tomašev, Stephanie Chan, Verena Rieser, Roma Patel, Michael Levin, Arun Rao arxiv

Existing alignment research is dominated by concerns about safety and preventing harm: safeguards, controllability, and compliance. This paradigm of alignment parallels early psychology's focus on mental illness: necessary but incomplete. What we call Positive Alignment is the development of AI systems that (i) actively support human and ecological flourishing in a pluralistic, polycentric, context-sensitive, and user-authored way while (ii) remaining safe and cooperative. It is a distinct and necessary agenda within AI alignment research. We argue that several existing failures of alignment (e.g., engagement hacking, loss of human autonomy, failures in truth-seeking, low epistemic humility, error correction, lack of diverse viewpoints, and being primarily reactive rather than proactive) may be better addressed through positive alignment, including cultivating virtues and maximizing human flourishing. We highlight a range of challenges, open questions, and technical directions (e.g., data filtering and upsampling, pre- and post-training, evaluations, collaborative value collection) for different phases of the LLM and agents lifecycle. We end with design principles for promoting disagreement and decentralization through contextual grounding, community customization, continual adaptation, and polycentric governance; that is, many legitimate centers of oversight rather than one institutional or moral chokepoint.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.10310

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Through a Christian Understanding of Human Flourishing

2026-04-03 · Nicholas Skytland, Lauren Parsons, Alicia Llewellyn, Steele Billings 외 arxiv

Artificial intelligence (AI) alignment is fundamentally a formation problem, not only a safety problem. As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly mediate moral deliberation and spiritual inquiry, they do more than pro…

Optimising for Flourishing: Flourishing Metrics and Return on Flourishing as Success Criteria for Artificial Intelligence and Post-AGI Economic Systems

2026-07-31 · Keyun Ruan, Jonathan D. Teubner, John M. Bremen arxiv

Current evaluation frameworks for artificial intelligence focus mainly on capability, safety, and proxies such as adoption, engagement, efficiency, productivity, and financial return. These criteria are necessary but ins…

From Human to Machine Psychology: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Well-Being in Large Language Model

2025-06-14 · G. R. Lau, W. Y. Low

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly simulate human cognition and behavior, researchers have begun to investigate their psychological properties. Yet, what it means for such models to flourish, a core construct i…

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language Model

Machine Love

2023-02-18 · Joel Lehman

While ML generates much economic value, many of us have problematic relationships with social media and other ML-powered applications. One reason is that ML often optimizes for what we want in the moment, which is easy t…

Artificial LifePhilosophy

A New Theory of Value for Post-AGI Economics

2026-08-02 · Keyun Ruan arxiv

Artificial general intelligence (AGI) may weaken scarcities in labour, expertise, information, and productive capability that underpin established theories of economic value. If cognitive work becomes widely automatable,…