Practical Annotation Strategies for Question Answering Datasets
Annotating datasets for question answering (QA) tasks is very costly, as it requires intensive manual labor and often domain-specific knowledge. Yet strategies for annotating QA datasets in a cost-effective manner are scarce. To provide a remedy for practitioners, our objective is to develop heuristic rules for annotating a subset of questions, so that the annotation cost is reduced while maintaining both in- and out-of-domain performance. For this, we conduct a large-scale analysis in order to derive practical recommendations. First, we demonstrate experimentally that more training samples contribute often only to a higher in-domain test-set performance, but do not help the model in generalizing to unseen datasets. Second, we develop a model-guided annotation strategy: it makes a recommendation with regard to which subset of samples should be annotated. Its effectiveness is demonstrated in a case study based on domain customization of QA to a clinical setting. Here, remarkably, annotating a stratified subset with only 1.2% of the original training set achieves 97.7% of the performance as if the complete dataset was annotated. Hence, the labeling effort can be reduced immensely. Altogether, our work fulfills a demand in practice when labeling budgets are limited and where thus recommendations are needed for annotating QA datasets more cost-effectively.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Question AnsweringSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Detecting Temporal Ambiguity in Questions
Detecting and answering ambiguous questions has been a challenging task in open-domain question answering. Ambiguous questions have different answers depending on their interpretation and can take diverse forms. Temporal…
Open-Domain Question AnsweringQuestion AnsweringFine-tuning Strategies for Domain Specific Question Answering under Low Annotation Budget Constraints
The progress introduced by pre-trained language models and their fine-tuning has resulted in significant improvements in most downstream NLP tasks. The unsupervised fine-tuning of a language model combined with further t…
Language ModelingLanguage ModellingQuestion AnsweringCoarse-grained decomposition and fine-grained interaction for multi-hop question answering
Recent advances regarding question answering and reading comprehension have resulted in models that surpass human performance when the answer is contained in a single, continuous passage of text, requiring only single-ho…
Multi-hop Question AnsweringQuestion AnsweringReading ComprehensionConsensus or Conflict? Fine-Grained Evaluation of Conflicting Answers in Question-Answering
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in question answering (QA) tasks. However, Multi-Answer Question Answering (MAQA), where a question may have several valid answers, remains challenging. T…
Question AnsweringMedThink: Explaining Medical Visual Question Answering via Multimodal Decision-Making Rationale
Medical Visual Question Answering (MedVQA), which offers language responses to image-based medical inquiries, represents a challenging task and significant advancement in healthcare. It assists medical experts to swiftly…
Decision MakingMedical Visual Question AnsweringQuestion AnsweringVisual Question Answering+1