Predicting Defects in Laser Powder Bed Fusion using in-situ Thermal Imaging Data and Machine Learning
Variation in the local thermal history during the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process in additive manufacturing (AM) can cause microporosity defects. in-situ sensing has been proposed to monitor the AM process to minimize defects, but the success requires establishing a quantitative relationship between the sensing data and the porosity, which is especially challenging for a large number of variables and computationally costly. In this work, we develop machine learning (ML) models that can use in-situ thermographic data to predict the microporosity of LPBF stainless steel materials. This work considers two identified key features from the thermal histories: the time above the apparent melting threshold (/tau) and the maximum radiance (T_{max}). These features are computed, stored for each voxel in the built material, are used as inputs. The binary state of each voxel, either defective or normal, is the output. Different ML models are trained and tested for the binary classification task. In addition to using the thermal features of each voxel to predict its own state, the thermal features of neighboring voxels are also included as inputs. This is shown to improve the prediction accuracy, which is consistent with thermal transport physics around each voxel contributing to its final state. Among the models trained, the F1 scores on test sets reach above 0.96 for random forests. Feature importance analysis based on the ML models shows that T_{max}is more important to the voxel state than /tau. The analysis also finds that the thermal history of the voxels above the present voxel is more influential than those beneath it.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Binary ClassificationFeature ImportanceMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
In-Situ Infrared Camera Monitoring for Defect and Anomaly Detection in Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Calibration, Data Mapping, and Feature Extraction
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process can incur defects due to melt pool instabilities, spattering, temperature increase, and powder spread anomalies. Identifying defects through in-situ monitoring typically requires co…
3D geometryAnomaly DetectionDefect DetectionThermal Control of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Powder-based additive manufacturing techniques provide tools to construct intricate structures that are difficult to manufacture using conventional methods. In Laser Powder Bed Fusion, components are built by selectively…
Deep Reinforcement Learningreinforcement-learningReinforcement Learning (RL)Surrogate Modeling of Melt Pool Thermal Field using Deep Learning
Powder-based additive manufacturing has transformed the manufacturing industry over the last decade. In Laser Powder Bed Fusion, a specific part is built in an iterative manner in which two-dimensional cross-sections are…
Deep LearningTransMatch: A Transfer-Learning Framework for Defect Detection in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing
Surface defects in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) pose significant risks to the structural integrity of additively manufactured components. This paper introduces TransMatch, a novel framework that merges transfer learnin…
Few-Shot LearningTransfer LearningInfluence of Spattering on In-process Layer Surface Roughness during Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) holds promise to efficiently produce metal parts. However, LPBF incurs stochastic melt pool (MP) spattering, which would roughen workpiece in-process surface, thus weakening inter-layer bon…