Predicting Institution Hierarchies with Set-based Models
The hierarchical structure of research organizations plays a pivotal role in science of science research as well as in tools that track the research achievements and output. However, this structure is not consistently documented for all institutions in the world, motivating the need for automated construction methods. In this paper, we present a new task and model for predicting sub-institution/super-institution relationships based on their string names. The crux of our model is that it leverages learned, permutation invariant representations of various token subsets of institution name strings. Our model outperforms or matches non-set-based models and baselines. We also create a dataset for training and evaluating models for this task based on the publicly available relationships in the Global Research Identifier Database.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Emergent Dominance Hierarchies in Reinforcement Learning Agents
Modern Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms are able to outperform humans in a wide variety of tasks. Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) settings present additional challenges, and successful cooperation in mixe…
Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningreinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)Computing Class Hierarchies from Classifiers
A class or taxonomic hierarchy is often manually constructed, and part of our knowledge about the world. In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm for automatically acquiring a class hierarchy from a classifier which i…
Predicting Customer Goals in Financial Institution Services: A Data-Driven LSTM Approach
In today's competitive financial landscape, understanding and anticipating customer goals is crucial for institutions to deliver a personalized and optimized user experience. This has given rise to the problem of accurat…
Hierarchical Dataset Selection for High-Quality Data Sharing
The success of modern machine learning hinges on access to high-quality training data. In many real-world scenarios, such as acquiring data from public repositories or sharing across institutions, data is naturally organ…
Measuring the Authority Stack of AI Systems: Empirical Analysis of 366,120 Forced-Choice Responses Across 8 AI Models
What values, evidence preferences, and source trust hierarchies do AI systems actually exhibit when facing structured dilemmas? We present the first large-scale empirical mapping of AI decision-making across all three la…