Predicting the Reproducibility of Social and Behavioral Science Papers Using Supervised Learning Models
In recent years, significant effort has been invested verifying the reproducibility and robustness of research claims in social and behavioral sciences (SBS), much of which has involved resource-intensive replication projects. In this paper, we investigate prediction of the reproducibility of SBS papers using machine learning methods based on a set of features. We propose a framework that extracts five types of features from scholarly work that can be used to support assessments of reproducibility of published research claims. Bibliometric features, venue features, and author features are collected from public APIs or extracted using open source machine learning libraries with customized parsers. Statistical features, such as p-values, are extracted by recognizing patterns in the body text. Semantic features, such as funding information, are obtained from public APIs or are extracted using natural language processing models. We analyze pairwise correlations between individual features and their importance for predicting a set of human-assessed ground truth labels. In doing so, we identify a subset of 9 top features that play relatively more important roles in predicting the reproducibility of SBS papers in our corpus. Results are verified by comparing performances of 10 supervised predictive classifiers trained on different sets of features.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
BIG-bench Machine LearningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research?
Assessing the reproducibility of social science papers is essential for promoting rigor in research processes, but manual assessment is costly. With recent advances in agentic AI systems (i.e., AI agents), we seek to eva…
Automated reproducibility assessments in the social and behavioral sciences using large language models
Reproducibility in the social and behavioral sciences is typically evaluated by independent researchers who reanalyze the original data to assess whether the published findings can be recovered. However, such approaches …
Read the Paper, Write the Code: Agentic Reproduction of Social-Science Results
Recent work has used LLM agents to reproduce empirical social science results with access to both the data and code. We broaden this scope by asking: Can they reproduce results given only a paper's methods description an…
PaperRepro: Automated Computational Reproducibility Assessment for Social Science Papers
Computational reproducibility is essential for the credibility of scientific findings, particularly in the social sciences, where findings often inform real-world decisions. Manual reproducibility assessment is costly an…
MTT-Bench: Predicting Social Dominance in Mice via Multimodal Large Language Models
Understanding social dominance in animal behavior is critical for neuroscience and behavioral studies. In this work, we explore the capability of Multimodal Large Language Models(MLLMs) to analyze raw behavioral video of…