paper-with-me

Papers

Privacy-Preserving Race/Ethnicity Estimation for Algorithmic Bias Measurement in the U.S

2024-09-06 · Saikrishna Badrinarayanan, Osonde Osoba, Miao Cheng, Ryan Rogers, Sakshi Jain, Rahul Tandra, Natesh S. Pillai

AI fairness measurements, including tests for equal treatment, often take the form of disaggregated evaluations of AI systems. Such measurements are an important part of Responsible AI operations. These measurements compare system performance across demographic groups or sub-populations and typically require member-level demographic signals such as gender, race, ethnicity, and location. However, sensitive member-level demographic attributes like race and ethnicity can be challenging to obtain and use due to platform choices, legal constraints, and cultural norms. In this paper, we focus on the task of enabling AI fairness measurements on race/ethnicity for \emph{U.S. LinkedIn members} in a privacy-preserving manner. We present the Privacy-Preserving Probabilistic Race/Ethnicity Estimation (PPRE) method for performing this task. PPRE combines the Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding (BISG) model, a sparse LinkedIn survey sample of self-reported demographics, and privacy-enhancing technologies like secure two-party computation and differential privacy to enable meaningful fairness measurements while preserving member privacy. We provide details of the PPRE method and its privacy guarantees. We then illustrate sample measurement operations. We conclude with a review of open research and engineering challenges for expanding our privacy-preserving fairness measurement capabilities.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2409.04652

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

FairnessPrivacy Preserving

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Focus 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Productionized Fairness Measurement Under Privacy Constraints

2026-06-25 · Osonde A. Osoba, Yuzi He, Saikrishna Badrinarayanan, Varun Mithal 외 arxiv

Fairness measurements in the form of disaggregated evaluations often rely on demographic signals that are legally constrained or culturally sensitive. Race and ethnicity signals are among the more difficult signals to cu…

Race and Privacy in Broadcast Police Communications

2024-07-01 · Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Christopher Graziul, Miranda Ardith Goodman, Samantha Nicole Kenny 외

Radios are essential for the operations of modern police departments, and they function as both a collaborative communication technology and a sociotechnical system. However, little prior research has examined their usag…

RIDDLE: Race and ethnicity Imputation from Disease history with Deep LEarning

2017-07-06 · Ji-Sung Kim, Xin Gao, Andrey Rzhetsky

Anonymized electronic medical records are an increasingly popular source of research data. However, these datasets often lack race and ethnicity information. This creates problems for researchers modeling human disease, …

Imputation

How should we proxy for race/ethnicity? Comparing Bayesian improved surname geocoding to machine learning methods

2022-06-26 · Ari Decter-Frain

Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding (BISG) is the most popular method for proxying race/ethnicity in voter registration files that do not contain it. This paper benchmarks BISG against a range of previously untested mach…

BIG-bench Machine Learning

Predicting Race and Ethnicity From the Sequence of Characters in a Name

2018-05-05 · Rajashekar Chintalapati, Suriyan Laohaprapanon, Gaurav Sood

To answer questions about racial inequality and fairness, we often need a way to infer race and ethnicity from names. One way to infer race and ethnicity from names is by relying on the Census Bureau's list of popular la…

Fairness