paper-with-me

Papers

Privacy-Utility Tradeoffs in Quantum Information Processing

2026-02-11 · Theshani Nuradha, Sujeet Bhalerao, Felix Leditzky arxiv

When sensitive information is encoded in data, it is important to ensure the privacy of information when attempting to learn useful information from the data. There is a natural tradeoff whereby increasing privacy requirements may decrease the utility of a learning protocol. In the quantum setting of differential privacy, such tradeoffs between privacy and utility have so far remained largely unexplored. In this work, we study optimal privacy-utility tradeoffs for both generic and application-specific utility metrics when privacy is quantified by $(\varepsilon,δ)$-quantum local differential privacy. In the generic setting, we focus on optimizing fidelity and trace distance between the original state and the privatized state. We show that the depolarizing mechanism achieves the optimal utility for given privacy requirements. We then study the specific application of learning the expectation of an observable with respect to an input state when only given access to privatized states. We derive a lower bound on the number of samples of privatized data required to achieve a fixed accuracy guarantee with high probability. To prove this result, we employ existing lower bounds on private quantum hypothesis testing, thus showcasing the first operational use of them. We also devise private mechanisms that achieve optimal sample complexity with respect to the privacy parameters and accuracy parameters, demonstrating that utility can be significantly improved for specific tasks in contrast to the generic setting. In addition, we show that the number of samples required to privately learn observable expectation values scales as $Θ((\varepsilon β)^{-2})$, where $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$ is the privacy parameter and $β$ is the accuracy tolerance. We conclude by initiating the study of private classical shadows, which promise useful applications for private learning tasks.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2602.10510

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Examining the Interplay Between Privacy and Fairness for Speech Processing: A Review and Perspective

2024-08-27 · Anna Leschanowsky, Sneha Das

Speech technology has been increasingly deployed in various areas of daily life including sensitive domains such as healthcare and law enforcement. For these technologies to be effective, they must work reliably for all …

Fairness

Evaluating Trade-offs in Computer Vision Between Attribute Privacy, Fairness and Utility

2023-02-15 · William Paul, Philip Mathew, Fady Alajaji, Philippe Burlina

This paper investigates to what degree and magnitude tradeoffs exist between utility, fairness and attribute privacy in computer vision. Regarding privacy, we look at this important problem specifically in the context of…

AttributeFairness

Quantum Pufferfish Privacy: A Flexible Privacy Framework for Quantum Systems

2023-06-22 · Theshani Nuradha, Ziv Goldfeld, Mark M. Wilde

We propose a versatile privacy framework for quantum systems, termed quantum pufferfish privacy (QPP). Inspired by classical pufferfish privacy, our formulation generalizes and addresses limitations of quantum differenti…

Fairness

Differentially Private Model Merging

2026-04-22 · Qichuan Yin, Manzil Zaheer, Tian Li arxiv

In machine learning, privacy requirements at inference or deployment time often evolve due to changing policies, regulations, or user preferences. In this work, we aim to construct a magnitude of models to satisfy any ta…

Context-aware Data Aggregation with Localized Information Privacy

2018-04-06 · Bo Jiang, Ming Li, Ravi Tandon

In this paper, localized information privacy (LIP) is proposed, as a new privacy definition, which allows statistical aggregation while protecting users' privacy without relying on a trusted third party. The notion of co…

Privacy Preserving