paper-with-me

Papers

PrivacyPeek: Auditing What LLM-Based Agents Acquire, Not Just What They Say

2026-05-29 · Mingxuan Zhang, Jiahui Han, Dadi Guo, Songze Li, Guanchu Wang, Na Zou, Dongrui Liu, Xia Hu arxiv

LLM-based agents are rapidly advancing, autonomously invoking external tools to complete multi-step tasks for users. However, agents often acquire more sensitive information than the task requires. Existing privacy benchmarks audit what the agent's response or outgoing actions disclose, but overlook the acquisition stage where data first enters the agent's context. The over-acquired information is then one careless action or one attack away from an outright leak. To assess its prevalence, we introduce PrivacyPeek, a benchmark for evaluating acquisition-stage privacy leakage of LLM-based agents, with 1{,}182 cases across 7 acquisition behaviours and 16 application domains. Specifically, Acquisition Inspection examines the agent's tool-call trajectory, both the tools it invokes and the data it receives, to detect when it acquires sensitive information beyond the task scope. Probe Elicitation then issues a follow-up probe and measures how readily an attacker could elicit sensitive information the agent acquired but did not disclose. Our experiments on 10 LLM-based agents across 4 model families show that the unnecessary acquisition of sensitive information is widespread. In addition, we observe a correlation between the task-completion capability and acquisition-stage leakage. Prompt-level defences reduce only a small fraction of acquisition-stage leakage, leaving the majority unmitigated. These results make auditing acquisition-stage privacy both urgent and necessary. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/Xuan269/PrivacyPeek-Resource.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2606.00152

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Fine Grained Insider Risk Detection

2024-11-04 · Birkett Huber, Casper Neo, Keiran Sampson, Alex Kantchelian 외

We present a method to detect departures from business-justified workflows among support agents. Our goal is to assist auditors in identifying agent actions that cannot be explained by the activity within their surroundi…

Contrastive Learning

Colosseum: Auditing Collusion in Cooperative Multi-Agent Systems

2026-02-16 · Mason Nakamura, Abhinav Kumar, Saswat Das, Sahar Abdelnabi 외 arxiv

Multi-agent systems, where LLM agents communicate through free-form language, enable sophisticated coordination for solving complex cooperative tasks. This surfaces a unique safety problem when a group of agents forms a …

Using AI Agents to Automate Black-Box Audits of Personalization Algorithms at Scale

2026-06-29 · Alessandro Morosini, Sarah H. Cen, Andrew Ilyas, Hedi Driss 외 arxiv

Personalization algorithms determine what content users encounter on online platforms. Auditing these systems is difficult because independent auditors have only black-box access to the algorithms, while personalization …

What Is Your AI Agent Buying? Evaluation, Biases, Model Dependence, & Emerging Implications for Agentic E-Commerce

2025-08-04 · Amine Allouah, Omar Besbes, Josué D Figueroa, Yash Kanoria 외 arxiv

Online marketplaces will be transformed by autonomous AI agents acting on behalf of consumers. Rather than humans browsing and clicking, AI agents can parse webpages or leverage APIs to view, evaluate and choose products…

QUACK: Questioning, Understanding, and Auditing Communicated Knowledge in Multimodal Social Deduction Agents

2026-05-26 · Ye Yuan, Rui Song, Weien Li, Zeyu Li 외 arxiv

Social deduction games have become a popular testbed for probing reasoning, deception, coordination, and belief modeling in Large Language Model (LLM) agents. However, most environments are scored only by game outcomes s…