paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Private learning implies quantum stability

2021-02-14 · NeurIPS 2021 12 · Srinivasan Arunachalam, Yihui Quek, John Smolin

Learning an unknown $n$-qubit quantum state $\rho$ is a fundamental challenge in quantum computing. Information-theoretically, it is known that tomography requires exponential in $n$ many copies of $\rho$ to estimate it up to trace distance. Motivated by computational learning theory, Aaronson et al. introduced many (weaker) learning models: the PAC model of learning states (Proceedings of Royal Society A'07), shadow tomography (STOC'18) for learning "shadows" of a state, a model that also requires learners to be differentially private (STOC'19) and the online model of learning states (NeurIPS'18). In these models it was shown that an unknown state can be learned "approximately" using linear-in-$n$ many copies of rho. But is there any relationship between these models? In this paper we prove a sequence of (information-theoretic) implications from differentially-private PAC learning, to communication complexity, to online learning and then to quantum stability. Our main result generalizes the recent work of Bun, Livni and Moran (Journal of the ACM'21) who showed that finite Littlestone dimension (of Boolean-valued concept classes) implies PAC learnability in the (approximate) differentially private (DP) setting. We first consider their work in the real-valued setting and further extend their techniques to the setting of learning quantum states. Key to our results is our generic quantum online learner, Robust Standard Optimal Algorithm (RSOA), which is robust to adversarial imprecision. We then show information-theoretic implications between DP learning quantum states in the PAC model, learnability of quantum states in the one-way communication model, online learning of quantum states, quantum stability (which is our conceptual contribution), various combinatorial parameters and give further applications to gentle shadow tomography and noisy quantum state learning.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2102.07171

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Learning TheoryPAC learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Quantum Differentially Private Sparse Regression Learning

2020-07-23 · Yuxuan Du, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Tongliang Liu, Shan You 외

The eligibility of various advanced quantum algorithms will be questioned if they can not guarantee privacy. To fill this knowledge gap, here we devise an efficient quantum differentially private (QDP) Lasso estimator to…

BIG-bench Machine Learningregression

Quantum statistical query learning

2020-02-19 · Srinivasan Arunachalam, Alex B. Grilo, Henry Yuen

We propose a learning model called the quantum statistical learning QSQ model, which extends the SQ learning model introduced by Kearns to the quantum setting. Our model can be also seen as a restriction of the quantum P…

PAC learning

Stability Enhanced Privacy and Applications in Private Stochastic Gradient Descent

2020-06-25 · Lauren Watson, Benedek Rozemberczki, Rik Sarkar

Private machine learning involves addition of noise while training, resulting in lower accuracy. Intuitively, greater stability can imply greater privacy and improve this privacy-utility tradeoff. We study this role of s…

feature selection

Privacy Implies Stability: Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Quantum Learning

2026-02-01 · Ayanava Dasgupta, Naqueeb Ahmad Warsi, Masahito Hayashi arxiv

We develop an information-theoretic framework connecting stability, privacy, and generalization for quantum learning algorithms. Learning procedures are modeled as quantum instruments with classical-quantum outputs, and …

Contraction of Private Quantum Channels and Private Quantum Hypothesis Testing

2024-06-26 · Theshani Nuradha, Mark M. Wilde

A quantum generalized divergence by definition satisfies the data-processing inequality; as such, the relative decrease in such a divergence under the action of a quantum channel is at most one. This relative decrease is…

Fairness