paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Probing Preference Representations: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation and Analysis Method for Reward Models

2025-11-16 · Chenglong Wang, Yifu Huo, Yang Gan, Yongyu Mu, Qiaozhi He, Murun Yang, Bei Li, Chunliang Zhang, Tongran Liu, Anxiang Ma, Zhengtao Yu, Jingbo Zhu, Tong Xiao arxiv

Previous methods evaluate reward models by testing them on a fixed pairwise ranking test set, but they typically do not provide performance information on each preference dimension. In this work, we address the evaluation challenge of reward models by probing preference representations. To confirm the effectiveness of this evaluation method, we construct a Multi-dimensional Reward Model Benchmark (MRMBench), a collection of six probing tasks for different preference dimensions. We design it to favor and encourage reward models that better capture preferences across different dimensions. Furthermore, we introduce an analysis method, inference-time probing, which identifies the dimensions used during the reward prediction and enhances its interpretability. Through extensive experiments, we find that MRMBench strongly correlates with the alignment performance of large language models (LLMs), making it a reliable reference for developing advanced reward models. Our analysis of MRMBench evaluation results reveals that reward models often struggle to capture preferences across multiple dimensions, highlighting the potential of multi-objective optimization in reward modeling. Additionally, our findings show that the proposed inference-time probing method offers a reliable metric for assessing the confidence of reward predictions, which ultimately improves the alignment of LLMs.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2511.12464

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Revisiting LLM Value Probing Strategies: Are They Robust and Expressive?

2025-07-17 · Siqi Shen, Mehar Singh, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Moontae Lee 외 arxiv

There has been extensive research on assessing the value orientation of Large Language Models (LLMs) as it can shape user experiences across demographic groups. However, several challenges remain. First, while the Multip…

Text Generation

STAGE: Controlled Objective Admission for Multi-Preference LLM Alignment

2026-08-17 · Yongqi Tong, Zhenyu Zhang, Ruirui Wang, Kewei Fu 외 arxiv

Multi-preference alignment is often framed as scalarization: combine reward dimensions, then optimize. This leaves a temporal decision underspecified: when should each preference dimension enter policy optimization? We p…

Detoxifying LLMs via Representation Erasure-Based Preference Optimization

2026-02-24 · Nazanin Mohammadi Sepahvand, Eleni Triantafillou, Hugo Larochelle, Doina Precup 외 arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) trained on webscale data can produce toxic outputs, raising concerns for safe deployment. Prior defenses, based on applications of DPO, NPO, and similar algorithms, reduce the likelihood of h…

How to Probe Sentence Embeddings in Low-Resource Languages: On Structural Design Choices for Probing Task Evaluation

2020-06-16 · CONLL 2020 · Steffen Eger, Johannes Daxenberger, Iryna Gurevych

Sentence encoders map sentences to real valued vectors for use in downstream applications. To peek into these representations - e.g., to increase interpretability of their results - probing tasks have been designed which…

SentenceSentence Embeddings

Beyond Scalars: Zonotope-Valued Utility for Representation of Multidimensional Incomplete Preferences

2025-07-08 · Behrooz Moosavi Ramezanzadeh

In this paper, I propose a new framework for representing multidimensional incomplete preferences through zonotope-valued utilities, addressing the shortcomings of traditional scalar and vector-based models in decision t…