Provocation: Contestability in Large-Scale Interactive NLP Systems
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Explainable AI Systems Must Be Contestable: Here's How to Make It Happen
As AI regulations around the world intensify their focus on system safety, contestability has become a mandatory, yet ill-defined, safeguard. In XAI, "contestability" remains an empty promise: no formal definition exists…
Systematic Literature ReviewContestable Camera Cars: A Speculative Design Exploration of Public AI That Is Open and Responsive to Dispute
Local governments increasingly use artificial intelligence (AI) for automated decision-making. Contestability, making systems responsive to dispute, is a way to ensure they respect human rights to autonomy and dignity. W…
Decision MakingExplainable AI Isn't Enough! Rethinking Algorithmic Contestability
Machine learning systems increasingly make life-changing decisions about individuals, such as loan approvals, hiring, and cheating detection, raising a pressing question: how can individuals respond to negative decisions…
Recommendations for Government Development and Use of Advanced Automated Systems to Make Decisions about Individuals
Contestability -- the ability to effectively challenge a decision -- is critical to the implementation of fairness. In the context of governmental decision making about individuals, contestability is often constitutional…
Decision MakingFairnessContestability in Quantitative Argumentation
Contestable AI requires that AI-driven decisions align with human preferences. While various forms of argumentation have been shown to support contestability, Edge-Weighted Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (…