PRPO: Paragraph-level Policy Optimization for Vision-Language Deepfake Detection
The rapid rise of synthetic media has made deepfake detection a critical challenge for online safety and trust. Progress remains constrained by the scarcity of large, high-quality datasets. Although multimodal large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, their performance on deepfake detection is poor, often producing explanations that are misaligned with visual evidence or hallucinatory. To address this limitation, we introduce a reasoning-annotated dataset for deepfake detection and propose Paragraph-level Relative Policy Optimization (PRPO), a reinforcement learning algorithm that aligns LLM reasoning with image content at the paragraph level. Experiments show that PRPO improves detection accuracy by a wide margin and achieves the highest reasoning score of 4.55/5.0. Ablation studies further demonstrate that PRPO significantly outperforms GRPO under test-time conditions. These results underscore the importance of grounding multimodal reasoning in visual evidence to enable more reliable and interpretable deepfake detection.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Reinforcement LearningMultimodal ReasoningDeepFake DetectionSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
PRPO: Aligning Process Reward with Outcome Reward in Policy Optimization
Policy optimization for large language models often suffers from sparse reward signals in multi-step reasoning tasks. Critic-free methods like GRPO assign a single normalized outcome reward to all tokens, providing limit…
PRPO: Perception-Reinforced Policy Optimization via Token-Level Dynamic Advantage Reshaping
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become an effective paradigm for improving the reasoning capability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). However, existing RLVR methods primarily rely on traj…
Reinforcement LearningMultimodal ReasoningProximal Ranking Policy Optimization for Practical Safety in Counterfactual Learning to Rank
Counterfactual learning to rank (CLTR) can be risky and, in various circumstances, can produce sub-optimal models that hurt performance when deployed. Safe CLTR was introduced to mitigate these risks when using inverse p…
counterfactualLearning-To-RankPractical and Robust Safety Guarantees for Advanced Counterfactual Learning to Rank
Counterfactual learning to rank (CLTR) can be risky and, in various circumstances, can produce sub-optimal models that hurt performance when deployed. Safe CLTR was introduced to mitigate these risks when using inverse p…
counterfactualLearning-To-RankMitigating Preference Hacking in Policy Optimization with Pessimism
This work tackles the problem of overoptimization in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), a prevalent technique for aligning models with human preferences. RLHF relies on reward or preference models trained…
Document Summarization