paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

PsychoSafe: Eliciting Psychologically-Informed Refusals in Large Language Models

2026-06-08 · Gianluca Barmina, Federico Torrielli, Sven Harms, Jacob Nielsen, Felix Mächtle, Stine Lyngsø Beltoft, Peter Schneider-Kamp, Thomas Eisenbarth, Lukas Galke Poech, Anne Lauscher arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) routinely face requests that should be refused, creating a trade-off between helpfulness and harm prevention. However, refusals themselves can be helpful. In high-risk interactions involving crisis, coercion, or escalating intent, blunt non-compliance may prevent direct harm while still failing to support the needs of the person behind the request. We present PsychoSafe, a psychologically-informed refusal framework that reframes refusal as structured supportive communication grounded in evidence-based intervention strategies. To develop PsychoSafe, we construct a corpus of 8019 prompt-response pairs spanning five psychologically salient risk domains and apply prompting and parameter-efficient fine-tuning to Qwen 3.5 27B. On a balanced validation set of 500 prompts, evaluated with an LLM judge and validated through human ratings, PsychoSafe prompting improves overall refusal quality by 28.1% over a generic baseline, with particularly strong gains in external resource referral (+46.8%) and psychological grounding (+34.8%), while preserving downstream performance on non-refusal tasks. Fine-tuning achieves near-perfect refusal and resource-referral rates but reduces response relevance. Additional evaluations on SORRY-Bench and XSTest show strong in-domain robustness but limited out-of-domain generalization, suggesting that future work should diversify fine-tuning data to help models apply interventions selectively rather than schematically.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2606.09697

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

parameter-efficient fine-tuningDomain Generalization

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

EVOREFUSE: Evolutionary Prompt Optimization for Evaluation and Mitigation of LLM Over-Refusal to Pseudo-Malicious Instructions

2025-05-29 · Xiaorui Wu, Xiaofeng Mao, Fei Li, Xin Zhang 외

Large language models (LLMs) frequently refuse to respond to pseudo-malicious instructions: semantically harmless input queries triggering unnecessary LLM refusals due to conservative safety alignment, significantly impa…

Safety Alignment

Psychologically Potent, Computationally Invisible: LLMs Generate Social-Comparison-Eliciting Posts They Fail to Detect

2026-05-01 · Hua Zhao, Jiapei Gu, Michelle Mingyue Gu arxiv

We introduce Xiaohongshu Social Comparison Reader Elicitation (XHS-SCoRE), a reader-grounded benchmark for detecting whether text-only Xiaohongshu (RedNote) posts elicit Upward, Downward, or Neutral/no clear social compa…

Generative Psycho-Lexical Approach for Constructing Value Systems in Large Language Models

2025-02-04 · Haoran Ye, Tianze Zhang, Yuhang Xie, Liyuan Zhang 외

Values are core drivers of individual and collective perception, cognition, and behavior. Value systems, such as Schwartz's Theory of Basic Human Values, delineate the hierarchy and interplay among these values, enabling…

BenchmarkingDecision Making

FalseReject: A Resource for Improving Contextual Safety and Mitigating Over-Refusals in LLMs via Structured Reasoning

2025-05-12 · Zhehao Zhang, Weijie Xu, Fanyou Wu, Chandan K. Reddy

Safety alignment approaches in large language models (LLMs) often lead to the over-refusal of benign queries, significantly diminishing their utility in sensitive scenarios. To address this challenge, we introduce FalseR…

16kBenchmarkingSafety Alignment

Psychologically-informed chain-of-thought prompts for metaphor understanding in large language models

2022-09-16 · Ben Prystawski, Paul Thibodeau, Christopher Potts, Noah D. Goodman

Probabilistic models of language understanding are valuable tools for investigating human language use. However, they need to be hand-designed for a particular domain. In contrast, large language models (LLMs) are traine…