PubMed Reasoner: Dynamic Reasoning-based Retrieval for Evidence-Grounded Biomedical Question Answering
Trustworthy biomedical question answering (QA) systems must not only provide accurate answers but also justify them with current, verifiable evidence. Retrieval-augmented approaches partially address this gap but lack mechanisms to iteratively refine poor queries, whereas self-reflection methods kick in only after full retrieval is completed. In this context, we introduce PubMed Reasoner, a biomedical QA agent composed of three stages: self-critic query refinement evaluates MeSH terms for coverage, alignment, and redundancy to enhance PubMed queries based on partial (metadata) retrieval; reflective retrieval processes articles in batches until sufficient evidence is gathered; and evidence-grounded response generation produces answers with explicit citations. PubMed Reasoner with a GPT-4o backbone achieves 78.32% accuracy on PubMedQA, slightly surpassing human experts, and showing consistent gains on MMLU Clinical Knowledge. Moreover, LLM-as-judge evaluations prefer our responses across: reasoning soundness, evidence grounding, clinical relevance, and trustworthiness. By orchestrating retrieval-first reasoning over authoritative sources, our approach provides practical assistance to clinicians and biomedical researchers while controlling compute and token costs.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Response GenerationClinical KnowledgeQuestion AnsweringResults from the Paper
| Rank | Task | Dataset | Model | Metrics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #8 | Question Answering | PubMedQA | PubMed | Accuracy: 78.32 |
| #3 | Retrieval | PubMedQA | PubMed | Accuracy (Top-1): 78.32 |
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
D$^2$Plan: Dual-Agent Dynamic Global Planning for Complex Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning
Recent search-augmented LLMs trained with reinforcement learning (RL) can interleave searching and reasoning for multi-hop reasoning tasks. However, they face two critical failure modes as the accumulating context become…
Reinforcement LearningYour Dense Retriever is Secretly an Expeditious Reasoner
Dense retrievers enhance retrieval by encoding queries and documents into continuous vectors, but they often struggle with reasoning-intensive queries. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) can reformulate queries to cap…
MuGER$^2$: Multi-Granularity Evidence Retrieval and Reasoning for Hybrid Question Answering
Hybrid question answering (HQA) aims to answer questions over heterogeneous data, including tables and passages linked to table cells. The heterogeneous data can provide different granularity evidence to HQA models, e.t.…
NavigateQuestion AnsweringRetrievalTimelineReasoner: Advancing Timeline Summarization with Large Reasoning Models
The proliferation of online news poses a challenge to extracting structured timelines from unstructured content. While recent studies have shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) can assist Timeline Summarization (TLS), …
Timeline SummarizationWorldReasoner: Evaluating Whether Language Model Agents Forecast Events with Valid Reasoning
Forecasting real-world events requires language-model agents to reason under uncertainty from incomplete, time-bounded information. Yet evaluating whether agents genuinely forecast requires more than final-answer accurac…