paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

PubMed Reasoner: Dynamic Reasoning-based Retrieval for Evidence-Grounded Biomedical Question Answering

2026-03-28 · Yiqing Zhang, Xiaozhong Liu, Fabricio Murai arxiv

Trustworthy biomedical question answering (QA) systems must not only provide accurate answers but also justify them with current, verifiable evidence. Retrieval-augmented approaches partially address this gap but lack mechanisms to iteratively refine poor queries, whereas self-reflection methods kick in only after full retrieval is completed. In this context, we introduce PubMed Reasoner, a biomedical QA agent composed of three stages: self-critic query refinement evaluates MeSH terms for coverage, alignment, and redundancy to enhance PubMed queries based on partial (metadata) retrieval; reflective retrieval processes articles in batches until sufficient evidence is gathered; and evidence-grounded response generation produces answers with explicit citations. PubMed Reasoner with a GPT-4o backbone achieves 78.32% accuracy on PubMedQA, slightly surpassing human experts, and showing consistent gains on MMLU Clinical Knowledge. Moreover, LLM-as-judge evaluations prefer our responses across: reasoning soundness, evidence grounding, clinical relevance, and trustworthiness. By orchestrating retrieval-first reasoning over authoritative sources, our approach provides practical assistance to clinicians and biomedical researchers while controlling compute and token costs.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2603.27335

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Response GenerationClinical KnowledgeQuestion Answering

Results from the Paper

RankTaskDatasetModelMetrics
#8 Question Answering PubMedQA PubMed Accuracy: 78.32
#3 Retrieval PubMedQA PubMed Accuracy (Top-1): 78.32

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

D$^2$Plan: Dual-Agent Dynamic Global Planning for Complex Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning

2026-01-13 · Kangcheng Luo, Tinglang Wu, Yansong Feng arxiv

Recent search-augmented LLMs trained with reinforcement learning (RL) can interleave searching and reasoning for multi-hop reasoning tasks. However, they face two critical failure modes as the accumulating context become…

Reinforcement Learning

Your Dense Retriever is Secretly an Expeditious Reasoner

2025-09-27 · Yichi Zhang, Jun Bai, Zhixin Cai, Shuhan Qin 외 arxiv

Dense retrievers enhance retrieval by encoding queries and documents into continuous vectors, but they often struggle with reasoning-intensive queries. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) can reformulate queries to cap…

MuGER$^2$: Multi-Granularity Evidence Retrieval and Reasoning for Hybrid Question Answering

2022-10-19 · Yingyao Wang, Junwei Bao, Chaoqun Duan, Youzheng Wu 외

Hybrid question answering (HQA) aims to answer questions over heterogeneous data, including tables and passages linked to table cells. The heterogeneous data can provide different granularity evidence to HQA models, e.t.…

NavigateQuestion AnsweringRetrieval

TimelineReasoner: Advancing Timeline Summarization with Large Reasoning Models

2026-04-03 · Liancheng Zhang, Xiaoxi Li, Zhicheng Dou arxiv

The proliferation of online news poses a challenge to extracting structured timelines from unstructured content. While recent studies have shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) can assist Timeline Summarization (TLS), …

Timeline Summarization

WorldReasoner: Evaluating Whether Language Model Agents Forecast Events with Valid Reasoning

2026-06-10 · Yizhou Chi, Eric Chamoun, Zifeng Ding, Andreas Vlachos arxiv

Forecasting real-world events requires language-model agents to reason under uncertainty from incomplete, time-bounded information. Yet evaluating whether agents genuinely forecast requires more than final-answer accurac…