QAScore -- An Unsupervised Unreferenced Metric for the Question Generation Evaluation
Question Generation (QG) aims to automate the task of composing questions for a passage with a set of chosen answers found within the passage. In recent years, the introduction of neural generation models has resulted in substantial improvements of automatically generated questions in terms of quality, especially compared to traditional approaches that employ manually crafted heuristics. However, the metrics commonly applied in QG evaluations have been criticized for their low agreement with human judgement. We therefore propose a new reference-free evaluation metric that has the potential to provide a better mechanism for evaluating QG systems, called QAScore. Instead of fine-tuning a language model to maximize its correlation with human judgements, QAScore evaluates a question by computing the cross entropy according to the probability that the language model can correctly generate the masked words in the answer to that question. Furthermore, we conduct a new crowd-sourcing human evaluation experiment for the QG evaluation to investigate how QAScore and other metrics can correlate with human judgements. Experiments show that QAScore obtains a stronger correlation with the results of our proposed human evaluation method compared to existing traditional word-overlap-based metrics such as BLEU and ROUGE, as well as the existing pretrained-model-based metric BERTScore.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Language ModelingLanguage ModellingQuestion GenerationQuestion-GenerationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
AQAScore: Evaluating Semantic Alignment in Text-to-Audio Generation via Audio Question Answering
Although text-to-audio generation has made remarkable progress in realism and diversity, the development of evaluation metrics has not kept pace. Widely-adopted approaches, typically based on embedding similarity like CL…
Question AnsweringAudio GenerationText GenerationEvaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generation
Despite significant progress in generative AI, comprehensive evaluation remains challenging because of the lack of effective metrics and standardized benchmarks. For instance, the widely-used CLIPScore measures the align…
Image to textQuestion AnsweringText GenerationVideo Generation+2Evaluating Attribute Confusion in Fashion Text-to-Image Generation
Despite the rapid advances in Text-to-Image (T2I) generation models, their evaluation remains challenging in domains like fashion, involving complex compositional generation. Recent automated T2I evaluation methods lever…
Attributecross-modal alignmentImage GenerationQuestion Answering+5GenAI-Bench: Evaluating and Improving Compositional Text-to-Visual Generation
While text-to-visual models now produce photo-realistic images and videos, they struggle with compositional text prompts involving attributes, relationships, and higher-order reasoning such as logic and comparison. In th…
BenchmarkingImage GenerationVideo GenerationUNION: An Unreferenced Metric for Evaluating Open-ended Story Generation
Despite the success of existing referenced metrics (e.g., BLEU and MoverScore), they correlate poorly with human judgments for open-ended text generation including story or dialog generation because of the notorious one-…
Story GenerationText Generation