paper-with-me

Papers

Quantifying identifiability to choose and audit $ε$ in differentially private deep learning

2021-03-04 · Daniel Bernau, Günther Eibl, Philip W. Grassal, Hannah Keller, Florian Kerschbaum

Differential privacy allows bounding the influence that training data records have on a machine learning model. To use differential privacy in machine learning, data scientists must choose privacy parameters $(\epsilon,\delta)$. Choosing meaningful privacy parameters is key, since models trained with weak privacy parameters might result in excessive privacy leakage, while strong privacy parameters might overly degrade model utility. However, privacy parameter values are difficult to choose for two main reasons. First, the theoretical upper bound on privacy loss $(\epsilon,\delta)$ might be loose, depending on the chosen sensitivity and data distribution of practical datasets. Second, legal requirements and societal norms for anonymization often refer to individual identifiability, to which $(\epsilon,\delta)$ are only indirectly related. We transform $(\epsilon,\delta)$ to a bound on the Bayesian posterior belief of the adversary assumed by differential privacy concerning the presence of any record in the training dataset. The bound holds for multidimensional queries under composition, and we show that it can be tight in practice. Furthermore, we derive an identifiability bound, which relates the adversary assumed in differential privacy to previous work on membership inference adversaries. We formulate an implementation of this differential privacy adversary that allows data scientists to audit model training and compute empirical identifiability scores and empirical $(\epsilon,\delta)$.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2103.02913

Code (2)

SAP-samples/security-research-identifiability-in-dpdl 공식 구현 tf
SAP-samples/security-research-dp-hierarchical-text tf

Tasks

BIG-bench Machine LearningInference Attack

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Debugging Differential Privacy: A Case Study for Privacy Auditing

2022-02-24 · Florian Tramer, Andreas Terzis, Thomas Steinke, Shuang Song 외

Differential Privacy can provide provable privacy guarantees for training data in machine learning. However, the presence of proofs does not preclude the presence of errors. Inspired by recent advances in auditing which …

Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient Descent

2025-07-21 · Matteo Boglioni, Terrance Liu, Andrew Ilyas, Zhiwei Steven Wu arxiv

In this work we study black-box privacy auditing, where the goal is to lower bound the privacy parameter of a differentially private learning algorithm using only the algorithm's outputs (i.e., final trained model). For …

Image Classification

Auditing Approximate Machine Unlearning for Differentially Private Models

2025-08-26 · Yuechun Gu, Jiajie He, Keke Chen arxiv

Approximate machine unlearning aims to remove the effect of specific data from trained models to ensure individuals' privacy. Existing methods focus on the removed records and assume the retained ones are unaffected. How…

Data Augmentation

A General Framework for Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning

2022-10-16 · Fred Lu, Joseph Munoz, Maya Fuchs, Tyler LeBlond 외

We present a framework to statistically audit the privacy guarantee conferred by a differentially private machine learner in practice. While previous works have taken steps toward evaluating privacy loss through poisonin…

Adversarial Sample-Based Approach for Tighter Privacy Auditing in Final Model-Only Scenarios

2024-12-02 · Sangyeon Yoon, Wonje Jeung, Albert No

Auditing Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) in the final model setting is challenging and often results in empirical lower bounds that are significantly looser than theoretical privacy guarantees…