paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Quantitative Linear Logic for Neuro-Symbolic Learning and Verification

2026-05-13 · Thomas Flinkow, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Matteo Capucci, Rosemary Monahan arxiv

Differentiable Logics are deployed in neuro-symbolic learning tasks as a way of embedding logical constraints in the training objective of neural networks. A differentiable logic consists of a syntax to write logical properties and a semantics to interpret them as real-valued functions to be folded in the loss function. A defining trade-off of the field is that between logical properties of the connectives, and analytic concerns for the semantics, with both aspects being relevant in applications. At one extreme we find fuzzy logics, that have well-established algebraic and proof-theoretic foundations, and at the other ad-hoc differentiable logics like Fischer's DL2, conceived for deep learning applications. However, no satisfactory foundation has emerged yet. We propose a resolution to this long-standing tension via a novel logic, Quantitative Linear Logic (QLL), with foundational ambitions. Our design is driven by naturality -- the idea that, since logical constraints are translated to losses, the semantics of the connectives should be pertinent operations used in ML practice (that is, sum and log-sum-exp) on additive quantities (like logits). We then judge the result on two aspects: logical adequacy -- that they satisfy most of the standard logical laws of Linear Logic; and empirical effectiveness -- test-time performance (as measured by adversarial attacks) is well-correlated to the actual verification of the logical constraints (as measured by off-the-shelf neural network verifiers), which makes QLL stand out among SoTA techniques.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.13845

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

NeuroNL2LTL: A Neurosymbolic Framework for Natural Language Translation of Linear Temporal Logic

2026-05-20 · Paapa Kwesi Quansah, Ernest Bonnah arxiv

Effectively translating between natural language (NL) and formal logics like Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) requires expertise that limits formal verification's reach in safety-critical development. Template-based approache…

Reinforcement LearningAutonomous Vehicles

Neuro-Symbolic Verification of Deep Neural Networks

2022-03-02 · Xuan Xie, Kristian Kersting, Daniel Neider

Formal verification has emerged as a powerful approach to ensure the safety and reliability of deep neural networks. However, current verification tools are limited to only a handful of properties that can be expressed a…

Adversarial RobustnessFairness

Neurosymbolic Clinical Trial Matching via LLM-Driven Abduction and Logical Verification

2026-06-18 · Baiyang Qu, Leonardo Ranaldi, Xi Wang, Marco Valentino arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising path to automate Clinical Trial Matching (CTM), but still struggle with the deterministic verification required for complex eligibility criteria. Conversely, purely symbolic…

A Neurosymbolic Approach to Loop Invariant Generation via Weakest Precondition Reasoning

2025-12-17 · Daragh King, Vasileios Koutavas, Laura Kovacs arxiv

Loop invariant generation remains a critical bottleneck in automated program verification. Recent work has begun to explore the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in this area, yet these approaches tend to lack a reliab…

Logic-Guided Vector Fields for Constrained Generative Modeling

2026-02-02 · Ali Baheri arxiv

Neuro-symbolic systems aim to combine the expressive structure of symbolic logic with the flexibility of neural learning; yet, generative models typically lack mechanisms to enforce declarative constraints at generation …