paper-with-me

Papers

Qworld: Question-Specific Evaluation Criteria for LLMs

2026-03-06 · Shanghua Gao, Yuchang Su, Pengwei Sui, Curtis Ginder, Marinka Zitnik arxiv

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) on open-ended questions is difficult because response quality depends on the question's context. Binary scores and static rubrics fail to capture these context-dependent requirements. Existing methods define criteria at the dataset level or generate them in a single pass, which limits their ability to explore the evaluation space implied by each question. We introduce One-Question-One-World (Qworld), a method that generates question-specific evaluation criteria using a recursive expansion tree. Given a question, Qworld decomposes it into scenarios, perspectives, and fine-grained binary criteria through hierarchical and horizontal expansion. The resulting criteria specify what a high-quality answer must address for that question. On HealthBench, Qworld covers 89% of expert-authored criteria and generates 79% novel criteria validated by human experts. Experts rate Qworld criteria higher in insight and granularity than those produced by prior methods. When applied to 11 frontier LLMs on HealthBench and Humanity's Last Exam, Qworld reveals capability differences in dimensions such as long-term impact, equity, error handling, and interdisciplinary reasoning that coarse rubrics do not capture. By generating evaluation criteria for each question, Qworld enables assessment of LLM responses that is tailored to the question rather than based on fixed task-level criteria.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2603.23522

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

QQWorld: Quantile-Quantile Matching for World Model Regularization

2026-07-30 · Zhoushun Yu, Xiaoyu Hu, Xiangyu Xu arxiv

Latent world models enable efficient planning by predicting future states in a compact representation space, but their performance depends critically on the quality of the learned latent distribution. LeWorldModel (LeWM)…

EvalAgent: Discovering Implicit Evaluation Criteria from the Web

2025-04-21 · Manya Wadhwa, Zayne Sprague, Chaitanya Malaviya, Philippe Laban 외

Evaluation of language model outputs on structured writing tasks is typically conducted with a number of desirable criteria presented to human evaluators or large language models (LLMs). For instance, on a prompt like "H…

AHP-Powered LLM Reasoning for Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Open-Ended Responses

2024-10-02 · Xiaotian Lu, Jiyi Li, Koh Takeuchi, Hisashi Kashima

Question answering (QA) tasks have been extensively studied in the field of natural language processing (NLP). Answers to open-ended questions are highly diverse and difficult to quantify, and cannot be simply evaluated …

Question Answering

Mastering the ABCDs of Complex Questions: Answer-Based Claim Decomposition for Fine-grained Self-Evaluation

2023-05-24 · Nishant Balepur, Jie Huang, Samraj Moorjani, Hari Sundaram 외

When answering complex questions, large language models (LLMs) may produce answers that do not satisfy all criteria of the question. While existing self-evaluation techniques aim to detect if such answers are correct, th…

Visual Question Decomposition on Multimodal Large Language Models

2024-09-28 · Haowei Zhang, Jianzhe Liu, Zhen Han, Shuo Chen 외

Question decomposition has emerged as an effective strategy for prompting Large Language Models (LLMs) to answer complex questions. However, while existing methods primarily focus on unimodal language models, the questio…

Visual Question Answering (VQA)