paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Rater Cohesion and Quality from a Vicarious Perspective

2024-08-15 · Deepak Pandita, Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya, Sujan Dutta, Sarah K. Luger, Tharindu Ranasinghe, Ashiqur R. KhudaBukhsh, Marcos Zampieri, Christopher M. Homan

Human feedback is essential for building human-centered AI systems across domains where disagreement is prevalent, such as AI safety, content moderation, or sentiment analysis. Many disagreements, particularly in politically charged settings, arise because raters have opposing values or beliefs. Vicarious annotation is a method for breaking down disagreement by asking raters how they think others would annotate the data. In this paper, we explore the use of vicarious annotation with analytical methods for moderating rater disagreement. We employ rater cohesion metrics to study the potential influence of political affiliations and demographic backgrounds on raters' perceptions of offense. Additionally, we utilize CrowdTruth's rater quality metrics, which consider the demographics of the raters, to score the raters and their annotations. We study how the rater quality metrics influence the in-group and cross-group rater cohesion across the personal and vicarious levels.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2408.08411

Code (1)

Homan-Lab/rater_cohesion_public 공식 구현

Tasks

Sentiment Analysis

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Vicarious Offense and Noise Audit of Offensive Speech Classifiers: Unifying Human and Machine Disagreement on What is Offensive

2023-01-29 · Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya, Sujan Dutta, Tharindu Ranasinghe, Marcos Zampieri 외

Offensive speech detection is a key component of content moderation. However, what is offensive can be highly subjective. This paper investigates how machine and human moderators disagree on what is offensive when it com…

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelMachine Translation

Cohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities

2016-08-17 · Darko Cherepnalkoski, Andreas Karpf, Igor Mozetic, Miha Grcar

We study the cohesion within and the coalitions between political groups in the Eighth European Parliament (2014--2019) by analyzing two entirely different aspects of the behavior of the Members of the European Parliamen…

Learning what they think vs. learning what they do: The micro-foundations of vicarious learning

2020-07-30 · Sanghyun Park, Phanish Puranam

Vicarious learning is a vital component of organizational learning. We theorize and model two fundamental processes underlying vicarious learning: observation of actions (learning what they do) vs. belief sharing (learni…

From Self to Other: Evaluating Demographic Perspective-Taking in LLM Hate Speech Annotation

2026-06-04 · Paloma Piot, Javier Parapar arxiv

Hate speech detection is inherently subjective: people from different demographic groups perceive the same content very differently. Collecting enough annotations from multiple demographic groups is costly and difficult …

Hate Speech Detection

Intrinsic Vicarious Conditioning for Deep Reinforcement Learning

2026-05-12 · Rodney A Sanchez, Ferat Sahin, Alex Ororbia, Jamison Heard arxiv

Advancements in reinforcement learning have produced a variety of complex and useful intrinsic driving forces; crucially, these drivers operate under a direct conditioning paradigm. This form of conditioning limits our a…

Reinforcement LearningContinual Learning