Reasoning over Boundaries: Enhancing Specification Alignment via Test-time Deliberation
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in diverse real-world scenarios, each governed by bespoke behavioral and safety specifications (spec) custom-tailored by users or organizations. These spec, categorized into safety-spec and behavioral-spec, vary across scenarios and evolve with changing preferences and requirements. We formalize this challenge as specification alignment, focusing on LLMs' ability to follow dynamic, scenario-specific spec from both behavioral and safety perspectives. To address this challenge, we propose Align3, a lightweight method that employs Test-Time Deliberation (TTD) with hierarchical reflection and revision to reason over the specification boundaries. We further present SpecBench, a unified benchmark for measuring specification alignment, covering 5 scenarios, 103 spec, and 1,500 prompts. Experiments on 15 reasoning and 18 instruct models with several TTD methods, including Self-Refine, TPO, and MoreThink, yield three key findings: (i) test-time deliberation enhances specification alignment; (ii) Align3 advances the safety-helpfulness trade-off frontier with minimal overhead; (iii) SpecBench effectively reveals alignment gaps. These results highlight the potential of test-time deliberation as an effective strategy for reasoning over the real-world specification boundaries. Our code and resources are available at https://github.com/zzzhr97/SpecBench.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Local Success Does Not Compose: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Compositional Formal Verification
We introduce DafnyCOMP, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on compositional specification generation in Dafny. Unlike prior benchmarks that focus on single-function tasks, DafnyCOMP targets programs …
Code GenerationR2IF: Aligning Reasoning with Decisions via Composite Rewards for Interpretable LLM Function Calling
Function calling empowers large language models (LLMs) to interface with external tools, yet existing RL-based approaches suffer from misalignment between reasoning processes and tool-call decisions. We propose R2IF, a r…
Not My Agent, Not My Boundary? Elicitation of Personal Privacy Boundaries in AI-Delegated Information Sharing
Aligning AI systems with human privacy preferences requires understanding individuals' nuanced disclosure behaviors beyond general norms. Yet eliciting such boundaries remains challenging due to the context-dependent nat…
Deliberative Alignment: Reasoning Enables Safer Language Models
As large-scale language models increasingly impact safety-critical domains, ensuring their reliable adherence to well-defined principles remains a fundamental challenge. We introduce Deliberative Alignment, a new paradig…
Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationSkillSpec: Intent-Masked Specification Reasoning for Agent Skill Correctness
Autonomous agent systems increasingly depend on reusable skill abstractions for consolidating experiential knowledge and domain expertise. These artifacts typically bundle free-form instructions with heterogeneous resour…