paper-with-me

Papers

Recover Experimental Data with Selection Bias using Counterfactual Logic

2025-05-31 · Jingyang He, Shuai Wang, Ang Li

Selection bias, arising from the systematic inclusion or exclusion of certain samples, poses a significant challenge to the validity of causal inference. While Bareinboim et al. introduced methods for recovering unbiased observational and interventional distributions from biased data using partial external information, the complexity of the backdoor adjustment and the method's strong reliance on observational data limit its applicability in many practical settings. In this paper, we formally discover the recoverability of $P(Y^*_{x^*})$ under selection bias with experimental data. By explicitly constructing counterfactual worlds via Structural Causal Models (SCMs), we analyze how selection mechanisms in the observational world propagate to the counterfactual domain. We derive a complete set of graphical and theoretical criteria to determine that the experimental distribution remain unaffected by selection bias. Furthermore, we propose principled methods for leveraging partially unbiased observational data to recover $P(Y^*_{x^*})$ from biased experimental datasets. Simulation studies replicating realistic research scenarios demonstrate the practical utility of our approach, offering concrete guidance for mitigating selection bias in applied causal inference.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2506.00335

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Causal InferencecounterfactualSelection bias

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

SET Dynamic Sparse Training method where weight mask is updated randomly periodically

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Reducing Selection Bias in Counterfactual Reasoning for Individual Treatment Effects Estimation

2019-12-19 · Zichen Zhang, Qingfeng Lan, Lei Ding, Yue Wang 외

Counterfactual reasoning is an important paradigm applicable in many fields, such as healthcare, economics, and education. In this work, we propose a novel method to address the issue of \textit{selection bias}. We learn…

counterfactualCounterfactual ReasoningSelection bias

Unifying Online and Counterfactual Learning to Rank

2020-12-08 · Harrie Oosterhuis, Maarten de Rijke

Optimizing ranking systems based on user interactions is a well-studied problem. State-of-the-art methods for optimizing ranking systems based on user interactions are divided into online approaches - that learn by direc…

counterfactualLearning-To-RankSelection bias

Counterfactual Inference for Text Classification Debiasing

2021-08-01 · ACL 2021 5 · Chen Qian, Fuli Feng, Lijie Wen, Chunping Ma 외

Today{'}s text classifiers inevitably suffer from unintended dataset biases, especially the document-level label bias and word-level keyword bias, which may hurt models{'} generalization. Many previous studies employed d…

ClassificationcounterfactualCounterfactual InferenceFairness+2

Taking the Counterfactual Online: Efficient and Unbiased Online Evaluation for Ranking

2020-07-24 · Harrie Oosterhuis, Maarten de Rijke

Counterfactual evaluation can estimate Click-Through-Rate (CTR) differences between ranking systems based on historical interaction data, while mitigating the effect of position bias and item-selection bias. We introduce…

counterfactualPositionSelection bias

To Model or to Intervene: A Comparison of Counterfactual and Online Learning to Rank from User Interactions

2019-07-15 · Rolf Jagerman, Harrie Oosterhuis, Maarten de Rijke

Learning to Rank (LTR) from user interactions is challenging as user feedback often contains high levels of bias and noise. At the moment, two methodologies for dealing with bias prevail in the field of LTR: counterfactu…

BenchmarkingcounterfactualLearning-To-RankSelection bias