Recover Experimental Data with Selection Bias using Counterfactual Logic
Selection bias, arising from the systematic inclusion or exclusion of certain samples, poses a significant challenge to the validity of causal inference. While Bareinboim et al. introduced methods for recovering unbiased observational and interventional distributions from biased data using partial external information, the complexity of the backdoor adjustment and the method's strong reliance on observational data limit its applicability in many practical settings. In this paper, we formally discover the recoverability of $P(Y^*_{x^*})$ under selection bias with experimental data. By explicitly constructing counterfactual worlds via Structural Causal Models (SCMs), we analyze how selection mechanisms in the observational world propagate to the counterfactual domain. We derive a complete set of graphical and theoretical criteria to determine that the experimental distribution remain unaffected by selection bias. Furthermore, we propose principled methods for leveraging partially unbiased observational data to recover $P(Y^*_{x^*})$ from biased experimental datasets. Simulation studies replicating realistic research scenarios demonstrate the practical utility of our approach, offering concrete guidance for mitigating selection bias in applied causal inference.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Causal InferencecounterfactualSelection biasMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Reducing Selection Bias in Counterfactual Reasoning for Individual Treatment Effects Estimation
Counterfactual reasoning is an important paradigm applicable in many fields, such as healthcare, economics, and education. In this work, we propose a novel method to address the issue of \textit{selection bias}. We learn…
counterfactualCounterfactual ReasoningSelection biasUnifying Online and Counterfactual Learning to Rank
Optimizing ranking systems based on user interactions is a well-studied problem. State-of-the-art methods for optimizing ranking systems based on user interactions are divided into online approaches - that learn by direc…
counterfactualLearning-To-RankSelection biasCounterfactual Inference for Text Classification Debiasing
Today{'}s text classifiers inevitably suffer from unintended dataset biases, especially the document-level label bias and word-level keyword bias, which may hurt models{'} generalization. Many previous studies employed d…
ClassificationcounterfactualCounterfactual InferenceFairness+2Taking the Counterfactual Online: Efficient and Unbiased Online Evaluation for Ranking
Counterfactual evaluation can estimate Click-Through-Rate (CTR) differences between ranking systems based on historical interaction data, while mitigating the effect of position bias and item-selection bias. We introduce…
counterfactualPositionSelection biasTo Model or to Intervene: A Comparison of Counterfactual and Online Learning to Rank from User Interactions
Learning to Rank (LTR) from user interactions is challenging as user feedback often contains high levels of bias and noise. At the moment, two methodologies for dealing with bias prevail in the field of LTR: counterfactu…
BenchmarkingcounterfactualLearning-To-RankSelection bias