Reexamining Racial Disparities in Automatic Speech Recognition Performance: The Role of Confounding by Provenance
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) models trained on large amounts of audio data are now widely used to convert speech to written text in a variety of applications from video captioning to automated assistants used in healthcare and other domains. As such, it is important that ASR models and their use is fair and equitable. Prior work examining the performance of commercial ASR systems on the Corpus of Regional African American Language (CORAAL) demonstrated significantly worse ASR performance on African American English (AAE). The current study seeks to understand the factors underlying this disparity by examining the performance of the current state-of-the-art neural network based ASR system (Whisper, OpenAI) on the CORAAL dataset. Two key findings have been identified as a result of the current study. The first confirms prior findings of significant dialectal variation even across neighboring communities, and worse ASR performance on AAE that can be improved to some extent with fine-tuning of ASR models. The second is a novel finding not discussed in prior work on CORAAL: differences in audio recording practices within the dataset have a significant impact on ASR accuracy resulting in a ``confounding by provenance'' effect in which both language use and recording quality differ by study location. These findings highlight the need for further systematic investigation to disentangle the effects of recording quality and inherent linguistic diversity when examining the fairness and bias present in neural ASR models, as any bias in ASR accuracy may have negative downstream effects on disparities in various domains of life in which ASR technology is used.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Automatic Speech RecognitionAutomatic Speech Recognition (ASR)Fairnessspeech-recognitionSpeech RecognitionVideo CaptioningMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Global Performance Disparities Between English-Language Accents in Automatic Speech Recognition
Past research has identified discriminatory automatic speech recognition (ASR) performance as a function of the racial group and nationality of the speaker. In this paper, we expand the discussion beyond bias as a functi…
Automatic Speech RecognitionAutomatic Speech Recognition (ASR)speech-recognitionSpeech RecognitionMacroeconomics of Racial Disparities: Discrimination, Labor Market, and Wealth
This paper examines the impact of racial discrimination in hiring on employment, wages, and wealth disparities between black and white workers. Using a labor search-and-matching model with racially prejudiced and non-pre…
Racial Sentencing Disparities and Differential Progression Through the Criminal Justice System: Evidence From Linked Federal and State Court Data
Several key actors -- police, prosecutors, judges -- can alter the course of individuals passing through the multi-staged criminal justice system. I use linked arrest-sentencing data for federal courts from 1994-2010 to …
Selection biasASR-FAIRBENCH: Measuring and Benchmarking Equity Across Speech Recognition Systems
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems have become ubiquitous in everyday applications, yet significant disparities in performance across diverse demographic groups persist. In this work, we introduce the ASR-FAIRBEN…
Automatic Speech RecognitionAutomatic Speech Recognition (ASR)BenchmarkingFairness+2Automatic Speech Recognition Biases in Newcastle English: an Error Analysis
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems struggle with regional dialects due to biased training which favours mainstream varieties. While previous research has identified racial, age, and gender biases in ASR, regional…
Automatic Speech RecognitionAutomatic Speech Recognition (ASR)Diversityspeech-recognition+1