paper-with-me

Papers

RefGrader: Automated Grading of Mathematical Competition Proofs using Agentic Workflows

2025-10-10 · Hamed Mahdavi, Pouria Mahdavinia, Samira Malek, Pegah Mohammadipour, Alireza Hashemi, Majid Daliri, Alireza Farhadi, Amir Khasahmadi, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Vasant Honavar arxiv

State-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs have progressed from struggling on proof-based Olympiad problems to solving most of the IMO 2025 problems, with leading systems reportedly handling 5 of 6 problems. Given this progress, we assess how well these models can grade proofs: detecting errors, judging their severity, and assigning fair scores beyond binary correctness. We study proof-analysis capabilities using a corpus of 90 Gemini 2.5 Pro-generated solutions that we grade on a 1-4 scale with detailed error annotations, and on MathArena solution sets for IMO/USAMO 2025 scored on a 0-7 scale. Our analysis shows that models can reliably flag incorrect (including subtly incorrect) solutions but exhibit calibration gaps in how partial credit is assigned. To address this, we introduce agentic workflows that extract and analyze reference solutions and automatically derive problem-specific rubrics for a multi-step grading process. We instantiate and compare different design choices for the grading workflows, and evaluate their trade-offs. Across our annotated corpus and MathArena, our proposed workflows achieve higher agreement with human grades and more consistent handling of partial credit across metrics. We release all code, data, and prompts/logs to facilitate future research.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2510.09021

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Draft, Sketch, and Prove: Guiding Formal Theorem Provers with Informal Proofs

2022-10-21 · Albert Q. Jiang, Sean Welleck, Jin Peng Zhou, Wenda Li 외

The formalization of existing mathematical proofs is a notoriously difficult process. Despite decades of research on automation and proof assistants, writing formal proofs remains arduous and only accessible to a few exp…

Automated Theorem ProvingLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingMathematical Proofs

Autograding Mathematical Induction Proofs with Natural Language Processing

2024-06-11 · Chenyan Zhao, Mariana Silva, Seth Poulsen

In mathematical proof education, there remains a need for interventions that help students learn to write mathematical proofs. Research has shown that timely feedback can be very helpful to students learning new skills. …

Mathematical InductionMathematical Proofs

Mask-Proof: An LLM-based Automated Data Curation Pipeline on Mathematical Proofs

2026-06-13 · Jierui Zhang, Siyuan Tan, Xinhang Li, Longzhuangzhi Lin 외 arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of mathematical problem solving and can even assist with research-level proofs, yet we still lack a scalable and reproducible way to measure step-level reasoning in l…

Mathematical Reasoning

ImProver: Agent-Based Automated Proof Optimization

2024-10-07 · Riyaz Ahuja, Jeremy Avigad, Prasad Tetali, Sean Welleck

Large language models (LLMs) have been used to generate formal proofs of mathematical theorems in proofs assistants such as Lean. However, we often want to optimize a formal proof with respect to various criteria, depend…

Language ModellingLarge Language Model

RealMath: A Continuous Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Research-Level Mathematics

2025-05-18 · Jie Zhang, Cezara Petrui, Kristina Nikolić, Florian Tramèr

Existing benchmarks for evaluating mathematical reasoning in large language models (LLMs) rely primarily on competition problems, formal proofs, or artificially challenging questions -- failing to capture the nature of m…

Mathematical Reasoning