Rejoinder for "Probabilistic Integration: A Role in Statistical Computation?"
This article is the rejoinder for the paper "Probabilistic Integration: A Role in Statistical Computation?" to appear in Statistical Science with discussion. We would first like to thank the reviewers and many of our colleagues who helped shape this paper, the editor for selecting our paper for discussion, and of course all of the discussants for their thoughtful, insightful and constructive comments. In this rejoinder, we respond to some of the points raised by the discussants and comment further on the fundamental questions underlying the paper: (i) Should Bayesian ideas be used in numerical analysis?, and (ii) If so, what role should such approaches have in statistical computation?
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Rejoinder: New Objectives for Policy Learning
I provide a rejoinder for discussion of "More Efficient Policy Learning via Optimal Retargeting" to appear in the Journal of the American Statistical Association with discussion by Oliver Dukes and Stijn Vansteelandt; Si…
Rejoinder: On nearly assumption-free tests of nominal confidence interval coverage for causal parameters estimated by machine learning
This is the rejoinder to the discussion by Kennedy, Balakrishnan and Wasserman on the paper "On nearly assumption-free tests of nominal confidence interval coverage for causal parameters estimated by machine learning" pu…
BIG-bench Machine LearningProbabilistic Integration: A Role in Statistical Computation?
A research frontier has emerged in scientific computation, wherein numerical error is regarded as a source of epistemic uncertainty that can be modelled. This raises several statistical challenges, including the design o…
Numerical IntegrationRejoinder: The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review
This article is the rejoinder to ``The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review,'' to appear in the Journal of the American Statistical Association with discussion. To address t…
Rejoinder for the discussion of the paper "A novel algorithmic approach to Bayesian Logic Regression"
In this rejoinder we summarize the comments, questions and remarks on the paper "A novel algorithmic approach to Bayesian Logic Regression" from the discussants. We then respond to those comments, questions and remarks, …
regression