paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Reproducibility is the New Copyleft: Defining AGI-oriented Reproducible Builds

2026-06-02 · Masayuki Hatta arxiv

Copyleft, as implemented in licenses such as the GNU General Public License, was a legal hack that used copyright to guarantee user freedom by tying the availability of source code to every act of distribution. Its normative force rested on an implicit technical premise: that source code and object code stand in a well-defined, humanly auditable, and reproducible relationship. Large language models and, prospectively, Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) systems systematically violate this premise. The artifacts jointly required to reconstruct a model -- code, data, weights, hyperparameters, toolchain, and hardware configuration -- are each subject to independent legal, technical, and economic constraints that no current open-source framework fully resolves. Sufficiently capable AI systems can also rewrite licensed source into functionally equivalent derivatives stripped of their original obligations, a form of laundering against which copyleft has no effective defense. This paper argues that a functional analogue of copyleft for AGI must be grounded not in share-alike clauses over code, but in reproducible builds: a practice guaranteeing bit-exact reconstructability from declared inputs. We review the logic of copyleft, critically examine Maffulli's Second Liberation thesis according to which AI fulfills Stallman's dream, and show that the argument collapses unless AGI systems are themselves reproducible. Drawing on the Open Source AI Definition (OSAID), the Model Openness Framework (MOF), OpenMDW, and deterministic-inference research, we define seven requirements for AGI-oriented reproducible builds. We further argue that the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and analogous AI-to-AI coupling mechanisms constitute a new dynamic linking layer for which copyleft-style licensing is ill-suited, and that Masnick's "protocols, not platforms" framework offers a more promising governance template.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2606.03019

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

How to Measure the Reproducibility of System-oriented IR Experiments

2020-10-26 · Timo Breuer, Nicola Ferro, Norbert Fuhr, Maria Maistro 외

Replicability and reproducibility of experimental results are primary concerns in all the areas of science and IR is not an exception. Besides the problem of moving the field towards more reproducible experimental practi…

Copyleft for Alleviating AIGC Copyright Dilemma: What-if Analysis, Public Perception and Implications

2024-02-19 · Xinwei Guo, YuJun Li, Yafeng Peng, Xuetao Wei

As AIGC has impacted our society profoundly in the past years, ethical issues have received tremendous attention. The most urgent one is the AIGC copyright dilemma, which can immensely stifle the development of AIGC and …

flowengineR: A Modular and Extensible Framework for Fair and Reproducible Workflow Design in R

2025-10-29 · Maximilian Willer, Peter Ruckdeschel arxiv

flowengineR is an R package designed to provide a modular and extensible framework for building reproducible algorithmic workflows for general-purpose machine learning pipelines. It is motivated by the rapidly evolving f…

Reproducible workflow for online AI in digital health

2025-09-16 · Susobhan Ghosh, Bhanu T. Gullapalli, Daiqi Gao, Asim Gazi 외 arxiv

Online artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are an important component of digital health interventions. These online algorithms are designed to continually learn and improve their performance as streaming data is coll…

dagger: A Python Framework for Reproducible Machine Learning Experiment Orchestration

2020-06-12 · Michela Paganini, Jessica Zosa Forde

Many research directions in machine learning, particularly in deep learning, involve complex, multi-stage experiments, commonly involving state-mutating operations acting on models along multiple paths of execution. Alth…

BIG-bench Machine LearningNetwork Pruning