paper-with-me

Papers

ResearchClawBench: A Benchmark for End-to-End Autonomous Scientific Research

2026-05-28 · Wanghan Xu, Shuo Li, Tianlin Ye, Qinglong Cao, Yixin Chen, Hengjian Gao, Yiheng Wang, Qi Li, Kun Li, Sheng Xu, Shengdu Chai, Fangchen Yu, Xiangyu Zhao, Zhangrui Zhao, Weijie Ma, Zijie Guo, Koutian Wu, Haoyu Zhou, Haoxiang Yin, Lixue Cheng, Chaofan Hu, Haoxuan Li, Lu Mi, Xuxuan Xie, Yifan Zhou, Ruizhe Chen, Zhiwang Zhou, Xingjian Guo, Yuhao Zhou, Xuming He, Shengyuan Xu, Xinyu Gu, Jiamin Wu, Mianxin Liu, Chunfeng Song, Fenghua Ling, Dongzhan Zhou, Shixiang Tang, Yuqiang Li, Mao Su, Peng Ye, Siqi Sun, Bin Wang, Xue Yang, Zhenfei Yin, Tianfan Fu, Guangtao Zhai, Wanli Ouyang, Bo Zhang, Lei Bai, Wenlong Zhang arxiv

AI coding agents are increasingly used for scientific work, but their end-to-end autonomous research capability remains difficult to verify. We present ResearchClawBench, a benchmark for evaluating autonomous scientific research across 40 tasks from 10 scientific domains. Each task is grounded in a real published paper, provides related literature and raw data, and hides the target paper during evaluation. Expert-curated multimodal rubrics decompose the target scientific artifacts into weighted criteria, enabling evaluation of target-paper-level re-discovery while leaving room for new discovery. We evaluate seven autonomous research (auto-research) agents under a unified protocol and seventeen native LLMs through the lightweight ResearchHarness. Current systems remain far from reliable re-discovery: the strongest autonomous agent, Claude Code, averages 21.5, and the strongest ResearchHarness LLM, Claude-Opus-4.7, averages 20.7, with an LLM frontier mean of only 26.5. Error analysis shows that failures concentrate in experimental protocol mismatch, evidence mismatch, and missing scientific core. ResearchClawBench provides a reproducible evaluation frontier for measuring progress toward autonomous scientific research.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2606.07591

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Learning to Evaluate Before Improving: Automatic Rubric Induction for Automatic Research Agents

2026-08-31 · Xuehai Wang, Haowei Qin, Tongxin Liu, Junkai Li 외 hf

Autonomous scientific research agents are increasingly applied to end-to-end scientific workflows, including literature review, data analysis, experimentation, and report generation. However, open-ended research tasks of…

AutoResearchBench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Complex Scientific Literature Discovery

2026-04-28 · Lei Xiong, Kun Luo, Ziyi Xia, Wenbo Zhang 외 arxiv

Autonomous scientific research is significantly advanced thanks to the development of AI agents. One key step in this process is finding the right scientific literature, whether to explore existing knowledge for a resear…

ResearchEnvBench: Benchmarking Agents on Environment Synthesis for Research Code Execution

2026-03-06 · Yubang Wang, Chenxi Zhang, Bowen Chen, Zezheng Huai 외 arxiv

Autonomous agents are increasingly expected to support scientific research, and recent benchmarks report progress in code repair and autonomous experimentation. However, these evaluations typically assume a pre-configure…

Code Repair

AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific Innovation

2025-05-24 · Jiabin Tang, Lianghao Xia, Zhonghang Li, Chao Huang

The powerful reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in mathematics and coding, combined with their ability to automate complex tasks through agentic frameworks, present unprecedented opportunities for acc…

scientific discovery

LABBench2: An Improved Benchmark for AI Systems Performing Biology Research

2026-02-04 · Jon M Laurent, Albert Bou, Michael Pieler, Conor Igoe 외 arxiv

Optimism for accelerating scientific discovery with AI continues to grow. Current applications of AI in scientific research range from training dedicated foundation models on scientific data to agentic autonomous hypothe…