paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Resolving Training Biases via Influence-based Data Relabeling

2021-09-29 · ICLR 2022 4 · Shuming Kong, Yanyan Shen, Linpeng Huang

The performance of supervised learning methods easily suffers from the training bias issue caused by train-test distribution mismatch or label noise. Influence function is a technique that estimates the impacts of a training sample on the model’s predictions. Recent studies on \emph{data resampling} have employed influence functions to identify \emph{harmful} training samples that will degrade model's test performance. They have shown that discarding or downweighting the identified harmful training samples is an effective way to resolve training biases. In this work, we move one step forward and propose an influence-based relabeling framework named RDIA for reusing harmful training samples toward better model performance. To achieve this, we use influence functions to estimate how relabeling a training sample would affect model's test performance and further develop a novel relabeling function R. We theoretically prove that applying R to relabel harmful training samples allows the model to achieve lower test loss than simply discarding them for any classification tasks using cross-entropy loss. Extensive experiments on ten real-world datasets demonstrate RDIA outperforms the state-of-the-art data resampling methods and improves model's robustness against label noise.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX

Code (1)

Viperccc/RDIA 공식 구현 pytorch

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Test 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Photometric Redshift Estimation with Convolutional Neural Networks and Galaxy Images: A Case Study of Resolving Biases in Data-Driven Methods

2022-02-21 · Q. Lin, D. Fouchez, J. Pasquet, M. Treyer 외

Deep Learning models have been increasingly exploited in astrophysical studies, yet such data-driven algorithms are prone to producing biased outputs detrimental for subsequent analyses. In this work, we investigate two …

Photometric Redshift EstimationRepresentation Learning

Relabeling Minimal Training Subset to Flip a Prediction

2023-05-22 · Jinghan Yang, Linjie Xu, Lequan Yu

When facing an unsatisfactory prediction from a machine learning model, users can be interested in investigating the underlying reasons and exploring the potential for reversing the outcome. We ask: To flip the predictio…

Binary ClassificationPrediction

Exploring the Influence of Label Aggregation on Minority Voices: Implications for Dataset Bias and Model Training

2024-12-05 · Mugdha Pandya, Nafise Sadat Moosavi, Diana Maynard

Resolving disagreement in manual annotation typically consists of removing unreliable annotators and using a label aggregation strategy such as majority vote or expert opinion to resolve disagreement. These may have the …

valid

PEAR: Permutation-Equivariant Adaptive Routing Multi-Agent Debate

2026-05-26 · Yang Feng, Ziwei Xu, Xia Hu, Fengxiang He arxiv

Multi-agent debate improves the reliability of large language models (LLMs) through iterative peer critiques. However, fixed topologies often introduce persistent positional biases, amplify unreliable agents, and cause h…

Hindsight Foresight Relabeling for Meta-Reinforcement Learning

2021-09-18 · ICLR 2022 4 · Michael Wan, Jian Peng, Tanmay Gangwani

Meta-reinforcement learning (meta-RL) algorithms allow for agents to learn new behaviors from small amounts of experience, mitigating the sample inefficiency problem in RL. However, while meta-RL agents can adapt quickly…

Meta Reinforcement Learningreinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)