Rethinking external validation for the target population: Capturing patient-level similarity with a generative model
Background: External validation is essential for assessing the transportability of predictive models. However, its interpretation is often confounded by differences between external and development populations. This study introduces a framework to distinguish model deficiencies from case-mix effects. Method: We propose a framework that quantifies each external patient's similarity to the development data and measures performance in subgroups with varying levels of alignment to the development distribution. We use generative models, specifically autoencoders, to estimate similarity, offering a more flexible alternative to traditional linear approaches and enabling validation without sharing the original development data. The utility of autoencoder-based similarity measure is demonstrated using synthetic data, and the framework's application is illustrated using data from the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR) to predict mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Results: Our framework revealed substantial variation in model performance across similarity-defined subgroups, differences that remain hidden under conventional external validation yet can meaningfully alter conclusions. In several settings, conventional external validation suggested poor overall performance. However, after accounting for differences in patient characteristics, for some sub-groups, the model performance was consistent with internal validation results. Conversely, apparently acceptable overall performance could mask clinically relevant performance deficits in specific subgroups. Conclusion: The proposed framework enhances the interpretability of external validation by linking model performance to population alignment with the development data. This provides a more principled basis for deciding whether a model is transportable and to which patients it can be safely applied.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
A roadmap to fair and trustworthy prediction model validation in healthcare
A prediction model is most useful if it generalizes beyond the development data with external validations, but to what extent should it generalize remains unclear. In practice, prediction models are externally validated …
PredictionRobustifying and Selecting Cohort-Appropriate Prognostic Models under Distributional Shifts
External validation is widely regarded as the gold standard for prognostic model evaluation. In this study, we challenge the assumption that successful external calibration guarantees model generalizability and propose t…
A Review of Generalizability and Transportability
When assessing causal effects, determining the target population to which the results are intended to generalize is a critical decision. Randomized and observational studies each have strengths and limitations for estima…
Causal InferenceEfficient Knowledge Graph Validation via Cross-Graph Representation Learning
Recent advances in information extraction have motivated the automatic construction of huge Knowledge Graphs (KGs) by mining from large-scale text corpus. However, noisy facts are unavoidably introduced into KGs that cou…
Graph Representation LearningKnowledge GraphsRepresentation LearningTripletLearning to Prune Dependency Trees with Rethinking for Neural Relation Extraction
Dependency trees have been shown to be effective in capturing long-range relations between target entities. Nevertheless, how to selectively emphasize target-relevant information and remove irrelevant content from the tr…
RelationRelation Extraction