Retrieval-Based Multi-Label Legal Annotation: Extensible, Data-Efficient and Hallucination-Free
Multi-label legal annotation requires assigning multiple labels from large, evolving taxonomies to long, fact-intensive documents, often under limited supervision. Parametric encoders typically require task-specific training and retraining when the label set changes, while prompting generative large language models becomes costly and degrades as the label space grows. We cast legal annotation as retrieval: we embed documents and label descriptions with a frozen retrieval model and predict labels via k-nearest neighbors in the embedding space, enabling updates by re-embedding and re-indexing rather than gradient-based backpropagation. Across three legal datasets (ECtHR-A, ECtHR-B, and Eurlex with 100 labels), retrieval achieves competitive accuracy and strong data efficiency; on Eurlex, Qwen-8B retrieval improves Macro-F1 from 40.41 (GPT-5.2, zero-shot) to 49.12 while reducing estimated compute by 20-30 times compared to fine-tuning. With only (N=100) training samples, retrieval nearly doubles Micro-F1 over hierarchical Legal-BERT on ECtHR-A (48.29 vs. 27.87). We also quantify a reliability failure mode of generative inference: GPT-5.2 hallucinates labels outside the provided taxonomy in 0.12-0.9% of test samples under deterministic decoding. In contrast, retrieval strictly respects defined label sets, eliminating hallucination by design. These results suggest retrieval-model-based annotators are a practical, deployable alternative for high-cardinality and rapidly changing legal label spaces.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
MUSER: A Multi-View Similar Case Retrieval Dataset
Similar case retrieval (SCR) is a representative legal AI application that plays a pivotal role in promoting judicial fairness. However, existing SCR datasets only focus on the fact description section when judging the s…
FairnessRetrievalSentencetext-classification+1VLegal-Bench: Cognitively Grounded Benchmark for Vietnamese Legal Reasoning of Large Language Models
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has enabled new possibilities for applying artificial intelligence within the legal domain. Nonetheless, the complexity, hierarchical organization, and frequent revis…
Legal ReasoningLegalPincite: Multi-level Legal Information Retrieval Dataset
A common task in legal Information Retrieval (IR) is to find relevant legal sources from case-law collections. While legal practice often requires pinpoint citations (pincites) to specific case paragraphs, most existing …
Information RetrievalA Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmark
As the legal community increasingly examines the use of large language models (LLMs) for various legal applications, legal AI developers have turned to retrieval-augmented LLMs ("RAG" systems) to improve system performan…
Question AnsweringRAGRetrievalJoint Span Segmentation and Rhetorical Role Labeling with Data Augmentation for Legal Documents
Segmentation and Rhetorical Role Labeling of legal judgements play a crucial role in retrieval and adjacent tasks, including case summarization, semantic search, argument mining etc. Previous approaches have formulated t…
Argument MiningData AugmentationRetrievalSegmentation+1