Retrieving Comparative Arguments using Ensemble Methods and Neural Information Retrieval
In this paper, we present a submission to the Touche lab's Task 2 on Argument Retrieval for Comparative Questions. Our team Katana supplies several approaches based on decision tree ensembles algorithms to rank comparative documents in accordance with their relevance and argumentative support. We use PyTerrier library to apply ensembles models to a ranking problem, considering statistical text features and features based on comparative structures. We also employ large contextualized language modelling techniques, such as BERT, to solve the proposed ranking task. To merge this technique with ranking modelling, we leverage neural ranking library OpenNIR. Our systems substantially outperforming the proposed baseline and scored first in relevance and second in quality according to the official metrics of the competition (for measure NDCG@5 score). Presented models could help to improve the performance of processing comparative queries in information retrieval and dialogue systems.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Argument RetrievalInformation RetrievalLanguage ModellingRetrievalTask 2Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
ArgumenText: Searching for Arguments in Heterogeneous Sources
Argument mining is a core technology for enabling argument search in large corpora. However, most current approaches fall short when applied to heterogeneous texts. In this paper, we present an argument retrieval system …
Argument MiningArgument RetrievalInformation RetrievalQuestion Answering+2Matching The Statements: A Simple and Accurate Model for Key Point Analysis
Key Point Analysis (KPA) is one of the most essential tasks in building an Opinion Summarization system, which is capable of generating key points for a collection of arguments toward a particular topic. Furthermore, KPA…
Opinion MiningOpinion SummarizationBuilding an Argument Search Engine for the Web
Computational argumentation is expected to play a critical role in the future of web search. To make this happen, many search-related questions must be revisited, such as how people query for arguments, how to mine argum…
Argument MiningDecision MakingA Comparative Study of Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them consists in using a ranking-based semantics which rank-order arguments from the most to the least acceptable ones. Recently…
Abstract ArgumentationParametric Bootstrap Ensembles as Variational Inference
In this paper, we employ variational arguments to establish a connection between ensemble methods for Neural Networks and Bayesian inference. We consider an ensemble-based scheme where each model/particle corresponds to …
Bayesian InferenceVariational Inference