paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

RewardRank: Optimizing True Learning-to-Rank Utility

2025-08-19 · Gaurav Bhatt, Kiran Koshy Thekumparampil, Tanmay Gangwani, Tesi Xiao, Leonid Sigal arxiv

Traditional ranking systems optimize offline proxy objectives that rely on oversimplified assumptions about user behavior, often neglecting factors such as position bias and item diversity. Consequently, these models fail to improve true counterfactual utilities such as such as click-through rate or purchase probability, when evaluated in online A/B tests. We introduce RewardRank, a data-driven learning-to-rank (LTR) framework for counterfactual utility maximization. RewardRank first learns a reward model that predicts the utility of any ranking directly from logged user interactions, and then trains a ranker to maximize this reward using a differentiable soft permutation operator. To enable rigorous and reproducible evaluation, we further propose two benchmark suites: (i) Parametric Oracle Evaluation (PO-Eval), which employs an open-source click model as a counterfactual oracle on the Baidu-ULTR dataset, and (ii) LLM-as-User Evaluation (LAU-Eval), which simulates realistic user behavior via large language models on the Amazon-KDD-Cup dataset. RewardRank achieves the highest counterfactual utility across both benchmarks and demonstrates that optimizing classical metrics such as NDCG is sub-optimal for maximizing true user utility. Finally, using real user feedback from the Baidu-ULTR dataset, RewardRank establishes a new state of the art in offline relevance performance. Overall, our results show that learning-to-rank can be reformulated as direct optimization of counterfactual utility, achieved in a purely data-driven manner without relying on explicit modeling assumptions such as position bias. Our code is available at: $https://github.com/GauravBh1010tt/RewardRank$

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2508.14180

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Optimizing Group-Fair Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and Ex-Post Fairness

2023-08-25 · Sruthi Gorantla, Eshaan Bhansali, Amit Deshpande, Anand Louis

In learning-to-rank (LTR), optimizing only the relevance (or the expected ranking utility) can cause representational harm to certain categories of items. Moreover, if there is implicit bias in the relevance scores, LTR …

FairnessLearning-To-Rank

Dual-Rerank: Fusing Causality and Utility for Industrial Generative Reranking

2026-04-08 · Chao Zhang, Shuai Lin, ChengLei Dai, Ye Qian 외 arxiv

Kuaishou serves over 400 million daily active users, processing hundreds of millions of search queries daily against a repository of tens of billions of short videos. As the final decision layer, the reranking stage dete…

Reinforcement LearningKnowledge Distillation

Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-Rank

2020-05-29 · Marco Morik, Ashudeep Singh, Jessica Hong, Thorsten Joachims

Rankings are the primary interface through which many online platforms match users to items (e.g. news, products, music, video). In these two-sided markets, not only the users draw utility from the rankings, but the rank…

ArticlesFairnessLearning-To-Rank

The Fault in Our Recommendations: On the Perils of Optimizing the Measurable

2024-05-07 · Omar Besbes, Yash Kanoria, Akshit Kumar

Recommendation systems are widespread, and through customized recommendations, promise to match users with options they will like. To that end, data on engagement is collected and used. Most recommendation systems are ra…

Recommendation Systems

Optimizing positional scoring rules for rank aggregation

2016-09-18 · Ioannis Caragiannis, Xenophon Chatzigeorgiou, George A. Krimpas, Alexandros A. Voudouris

Nowadays, several crowdsourcing projects exploit social choice methods for computing an aggregate ranking of alternatives given individual rankings provided by workers. Motivated by such systems, we consider a setting wh…

scoring rule