RHyVE: Competence-Aware Verification and Phase-Aware Deployment for LLM-Generated Reward Hypotheses
Large language models (LLMs) make reward design in reinforcement learning substantially more scalable, but generated rewards are not automatically reliable training objectives. Existing work has focused primarily on generating, evolving, or selecting reward candidates, while paying less attention to when such candidates can be verified and deployed during policy optimization. We study this deployment-time problem by treating generated rewards as reward hypotheses whose utility depends on the competence of the current policy and the phase of training. We propose \textsc{RHyVE}, a competence-aware verification and phase-aware deployment protocol that compares small sets of reward hypotheses from shared policy checkpoints using short-horizon fork verification. Our experiments show that reward rankings are unreliable at low competence but become informative after task-dependent thresholds. On a sparse manipulation task, phase-aware deployment improves peak and retained performance under a locked protocol. Updated LLM-generated reward-candidate experiments show candidate-family-dependent behavior: generated pools can exhibit phase-dependent winner changes, but no fixed warm-up schedule is universally optimal. Held-out schedule selection, conservative selector baselines, compute-matched controls, and scale controls further show that \textsc{RHyVE} is best understood as a verification-informed deployment protocol rather than a universal scheduler. Dense and all-failure boundary experiments delimit the scope of the method. Together, these results suggest that reward generation and reward deployment should be studied as coupled problems: generated rewards must be verified and deployed under changing policy competence.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Reinforcement LearningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
INSURE-Dial: A Phase-Aware Conversational Dataset & Benchmark for Compliance Verification and Phase Detection
Administrative phone tasks drain roughly 1 trillion USD annually from U.S. healthcare, with over 500 million insurance-benefit verification calls manually handled in 2024. We introduce INSURE-Dial, to our knowledge the f…
Boundary DetectionCompetence-Aware Path Planning via Introspective Perception
Robots deployed in the real world over extended periods of time need to reason about unexpected failures, learn to predict them, and to proactively take actions to avoid future failures. Existing approaches for competenc…
SEAD: Competence-Aware On-Policy Distillation via Entropy-Guided Supervision
On-policy distillation (OPD) has a property absent in offline distillation and RL: teacher supervision quality depends on student competence. Incoherent rollouts yield noisy gradients; already-mastered tokens yield redun…
Evidence Absence Is Not Evidence Insufficiency: Diagnosing NEI Construction Artifacts in Fact Verification
Evidence absence is not evidence insufficiency, but fact verification benchmarks can make them observationally similar. The Not Enough Information (NEI) label is often operationalized through different evidence condition…
Fact VerificationA Competence-aware Curriculum for Visual Concepts Learning via Question Answering
Humans can progressively learn visual concepts from easy to hard questions. To mimic this efficient learning ability, we propose a competence-aware curriculum for visual concept learning in a question-answering manner. S…
Question Answering