paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanations

2017-03-10 · Andrew Slavin Ross, Michael C. Hughes, Finale Doshi-Velez

Neural networks are among the most accurate supervised learning methods in use today, but their opacity makes them difficult to trust in critical applications, especially when conditions in training differ from those in test. Recent work on explanations for black-box models has produced tools (e.g. LIME) to show the implicit rules behind predictions, which can help us identify when models are right for the wrong reasons. However, these methods do not scale to explaining entire datasets and cannot correct the problems they reveal. We introduce a method for efficiently explaining and regularizing differentiable models by examining and selectively penalizing their input gradients, which provide a normal to the decision boundary. We apply these penalties both based on expert annotation and in an unsupervised fashion that encourages diverse models with qualitatively different decision boundaries for the same classification problem. On multiple datasets, we show our approach generates faithful explanations and models that generalize much better when conditions differ between training and test.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1703.03717

Code (1)

dtak/rrr 공식 구현

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Model Guidance via Explanations Turns Image Classifiers into Segmentation Models

2024-07-03 · Xiaoyan Yu, Jannik Franzen, Wojciech Samek, Marina M. -C. Höhne 외

Heatmaps generated on inputs of image classification networks via explainable AI methods like Grad-CAM and LRP have been observed to resemble segmentations of input images in many cases. Consequently, heatmaps have also …

Decoderimage-classificationImage ClassificationImage Segmentation+3

Why do you think that? Exploring Faithful Sentence-Level Rationales Without Supervision

2020-10-07 · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2020 · Max Glockner, Ivan Habernal, Iryna Gurevych

Evaluating the trustworthiness of a model's prediction is essential for differentiating between `right for the right reasons' and `right for the wrong reasons'. Identifying textual spans that determine the target label, …

Decision MakingSentence

Right on Time: Revising Time Series Models by Constraining their Explanations

2024-02-20 · Maurice Kraus, David Steinmann, Antonia Wüst, Andre Kokozinski 외

The reliability of deep time series models is often compromised by their tendency to rely on confounding factors, which may lead to incorrect outputs. Our newly recorded, naturally confounded dataset named P2S from a rea…

Time SeriesTime Series Classification

Remembering for the Right Reasons: Explanations Reduce Catastrophic Forgetting

2020-10-04 · ICLR 2021 1 · Sayna Ebrahimi, Suzanne Petryk, Akash Gokul, William Gan 외

The goal of continual learning (CL) is to learn a sequence of tasks without suffering from the phenomenon of catastrophic forgetting. Previous work has shown that leveraging memory in the form of a replay buffer can redu…

Continual Learning

Making Document-Level Information Extraction Right for the Right Reasons

2021-10-14 · Liyan Tang, Dhruv Rajan, Suyash Mohan, Abhijeet Pradhan 외

Document-level models for information extraction tasks like slot-filling are flexible: they can be applied to settings where information is not necessarily localized in a single sentence. For example, key features of a d…

Sentenceslot-fillingSlot Filling