Robust Generalization and Safe Query-Specialization in Counterfactual Learning to Rank
Existing work in counterfactual Learning to Rank (LTR) has focussed on optimizing feature-based models that predict the optimal ranking based on document features. LTR methods based on bandit algorithms often optimize tabular models that memorize the optimal ranking per query. These types of model have their own advantages and disadvantages. Feature-based models provide very robust performance across many queries, including those previously unseen, however, the available features often limit the rankings the model can predict. In contrast, tabular models can converge on any possible ranking through memorization. However, memorization is extremely prone to noise, which makes tabular models reliable only when large numbers of user interactions are available. Can we develop a robust counterfactual LTR method that pursues memorization-based optimization whenever it is safe to do? We introduce the Generalization and Specialization (GENSPEC) algorithm, a robust feature-based counterfactual LTR method that pursues per-query memorization when it is safe to do so. GENSPEC optimizes a single feature-based model for generalization: robust performance across all queries, and many tabular models for specialization: each optimized for high performance on a single query. GENSPEC uses novel relative high-confidence bounds to choose which model to deploy per query. By doing so, GENSPEC enjoys the high performance of successfully specialized tabular models with the robustness of a generalized feature-based model. Our results show that GENSPEC leads to optimal performance on queries with sufficient click data, while having robust behavior on queries with little or noisy data.
Code (1)
Tasks
counterfactualLearning-To-RankMemorizationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
CREDENCE: Counterfactual Explanations for Document Ranking
Towards better explainability in the field of information retrieval, we present CREDENCE, an interactive tool capable of generating counterfactual explanations for document rankers. Embracing the unique properties of the…
counterfactualDocument RankingInformation RetrievalRetrievalCounterfactual Learning To Rank for Utility-Maximizing Query Autocompletion
Conventional methods for query autocompletion aim to predict which completed query a user will select from a list. A shortcoming of this approach is that users often do not know which query will provide the best retrieva…
counterfactualInformation RetrievalLearning-To-RankRetrievalProximal Ranking Policy Optimization for Practical Safety in Counterfactual Learning to Rank
Counterfactual learning to rank (CLTR) can be risky and, in various circumstances, can produce sub-optimal models that hurt performance when deployed. Safe CLTR was introduced to mitigate these risks when using inverse p…
counterfactualLearning-To-RankCounterfactual Risk Minimization: Learning from Logged Bandit Feedback
We develop a learning principle and an efficient algorithm for batch learning from logged bandit feedback. This learning setting is ubiquitous in online systems (e.g., ad placement, web search, recommendation), where an …
counterfactualMulti-Label ClassificationMUlTI-LABEL-ClASSIFICATIONRankFlow: A Multi-Role Collaborative Reranking Workflow Utilizing Large Language Models
In an Information Retrieval (IR) system, reranking plays a critical role by sorting candidate passages according to their relevance to a specific query. This process demands a nuanced understanding of the variations amon…
Information RetrievalReranking