RuozhiBench: Evaluating LLMs with Logical Fallacies and Misleading Premises
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown that they can answer questions requiring complex reasoning. However, their ability to identify and respond to text containing logical fallacies or deliberately misleading premises remains less studied. To address this gap, we introduce RuozhiBench, a bilingual dataset comprising 677 carefully curated questions that contain various forms of deceptive reasoning, meticulously crafted through extensive human effort and expert review. In a comprehensive evaluation of 17 LLMs from 5 Series over RuozhiBench using both open-ended and two-choice formats, we conduct extensive analyses on evaluation protocols and result patterns. Despite their high scores on conventional benchmarks, these models showed limited ability to detect and reason correctly about logical fallacies, with even the best-performing model, Claude-3-haiku, achieving only 62% accuracy compared to the human of more than 90%.
Code (1)
Tasks
Logical FallaciesSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Truth or Sophistry? LoFa: A Benchmark for LLM Robustness Against Logical Fallacies
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong semantic capabilities, yet their resilience to manipulative linguistic patterns such as logical fallacies remains underexplored. Prior work has primarily examined whether LLMs …
Logical FallaciesDetecting Fallacies in Climate Misinformation: A Technocognitive Approach to Identifying Misleading Argumentation
Misinformation about climate change is a complex societal issue requiring holistic, interdisciplinary solutions at the intersection between technology and psychology. One proposed solution is a "technocognitive" approach…
MisinformationHow susceptible are LLMs to Logical Fallacies?
This paper investigates the rational thinking capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) in multi-round argumentative debates by exploring the impact of fallacious arguments on their logical reasoning performance. More s…
DiagnosticLogical FallaciesLogical ReasoningA Closer Look at the Self-Verification Abilities of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning has been an ongoing pursuit in the field of AI. Despite significant advancements made by large language models (LLMs), they still struggle with complex logical reasoning problems. To enhance reasoning p…
Logical FallaciesLogical ReasoningSocrates or Smartypants: Testing Logic Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models with Logic Programming-based Test Oracles
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved significant progress in language understanding and reasoning. Evaluating and analyzing their logical reasoning abilities has therefore become essential. However, existing datase…
Logical FallaciesLogical Reasoning