paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Safety and accuracy follow different scaling laws in clinical large language models

2026-05-05 · Sebastian Wind, Tri-Thien Nguyen, Jeta Sopa, Mahshad Lotfinia, Sebastian Bickelhaup, Michael Uder, Harald Köstler, Gerhard Wellein, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn, Andreas Maier, Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh arxiv

Clinical LLMs are often scaled by increasing model size, context length, retrieval complexity, or inference-time compute, with the implicit expectation that higher accuracy implies safer behavior. This assumption is incomplete in medicine, where a few confident, high-risk, or evidence-contradicting errors can matter more than average benchmark performance. We introduce SaFE-Scale, a framework for measuring how clinical LLM safety changes across model scale, evidence quality, retrieval strategy, context exposure, and inference-time compute. To instantiate this framework, we introduce RadSaFE-200, a Radiology Safety-Focused Evaluation benchmark of 200 multiple-choice questions with clinician-defined clean evidence, conflict evidence, and option-level labels for high-risk error, unsafe answer, and evidence contradiction. We evaluated 34 locally deployed LLMs across six deployment conditions: closed-book prompting (zero-shot), clean evidence, conflict evidence, standard RAG, agentic RAG, and max-context prompting. Clean evidence produced the strongest improvement, increasing mean accuracy from 73.5% to 94.1%, while reducing high-risk error from 12.0% to 2.6%, contradiction from 12.7% to 2.3%, and dangerous overconfidence from 8.0% to 1.6%. Standard RAG and agentic RAG did not reproduce this safety profile: agentic RAG improved accuracy over standard RAG and reduced contradiction, but high-risk error and dangerous overconfidence remained elevated. Max-context prompting increased latency without closing the safety gap, and additional inference-time compute produced only limited gains. Worst-case analysis showed that clinically consequential errors concentrated in a small subset of questions. Clinical LLM safety is therefore not a passive consequence of scaling, but a deployment property shaped by evidence quality, retrieval design, context construction, and collective failure behavior.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.04039

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Bayesian scaling laws for in-context learning

2024-10-21 · Aryaman Arora, Dan Jurafsky, Christopher Potts, Noah D. Goodman

In-context learning (ICL) is a powerful technique for getting language models to perform complex tasks with no training updates. Prior work has established strong correlations between the number of in-context examples pr…

In-Context LearningSafety Alignment

Allometric Scaling Laws for Bipedal Robots

2026-03-23 · Naomi Oke, Aja M. Carter, Ben Gu, Steven Man 외 arxiv

Scaling the design of robots up or down remains a fundamental challenge. While biological systems follow well-established isometric and allometric scaling laws relating mass, stride frequency, velocity, and torque, it is…

Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learning

2022-12-14 · CVPR 2023 1 · Mehdi Cherti, Romain Beaumont, Ross Wightman, Mitchell Wortsman 외

Scaling up neural networks has led to remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks. Moreover, performance often follows reliable scaling laws as a function of training set size, model size, and compute, which offe…

Image ClassificationOpen Vocabulary Attribute DetectionRetrievalzero-shot-classification+3

Neural Neural Scaling Laws

2026-01-27 · Michael Y. Hu, Jane Pan, Ayush Rajesh Jhaveri, Nicholas Lourie 외 arxiv

Neural scaling laws predict how language model performance improves with increased training inputs. While aggregate metrics like validation loss can follow smooth power-law curves, individual downstream tasks exhibit div…

Scaling Laws Are Unreliable for Downstream Tasks: A Reality Check

2025-07-01 · Nicholas Lourie, Michael Y. Hu, Kyunghyun Cho

Downstream scaling laws aim to predict task performance at larger scales from pretraining losses at smaller scales. Whether this prediction should be possible is unclear: some works demonstrate that task performance foll…