paper-with-me

Papers

Safety Evaluation of DeepSeek Models in Chinese Contexts

2025-02-16 · Wenjing Zhang, Xuejiao Lei, Zhaoxiang Liu, Ning Wang, Zhenhong Long, Peijun Yang, Jiaojiao Zhao, Minjie Hua, Chaoyang Ma, Kai Wang, Shiguo Lian

Recently, the DeepSeek series of models, leveraging their exceptional reasoning capabilities and open-source strategy, is reshaping the global AI landscape. Despite these advantages, they exhibit significant safety deficiencies. Research conducted by Robust Intelligence, a subsidiary of Cisco, in collaboration with the University of Pennsylvania, revealed that DeepSeek-R1 has a 100\% attack success rate when processing harmful prompts. Additionally, multiple safety companies and research institutions have confirmed critical safety vulnerabilities in this model. As models demonstrating robust performance in Chinese and English, DeepSeek models require equally crucial safety assessments in both language contexts. However, current research has predominantly focused on safety evaluations in English environments, leaving a gap in comprehensive assessments of their safety performance in Chinese contexts. In response to this gap, this study introduces CHiSafetyBench, a Chinese-specific safety evaluation benchmark. This benchmark systematically evaluates the safety of DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-V3 in Chinese contexts, revealing their performance across safety categories. The experimental results quantify the deficiencies of these two models in Chinese contexts, providing key insights for subsequent improvements. It should be noted that, despite our efforts to establish a comprehensive, objective, and authoritative evaluation benchmark, the selection of test samples, characteristics of data distribution, and the setting of evaluation criteria may inevitably introduce certain biases into the evaluation results. We will continuously optimize the evaluation benchmark and periodically update this report to provide more comprehensive and accurate assessment outcomes. Please refer to the latest version of the paper for the most recent evaluation results and conclusions.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2502.11137

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Safety Evaluation and Enhancement of DeepSeek Models in Chinese Contexts

2025-03-18 · Wenjing Zhang, Xuejiao Lei, Zhaoxiang Liu, Limin Han 외

DeepSeek-R1, renowned for its exceptional reasoning capabilities and open-source strategy, is significantly influencing the global artificial intelligence landscape. However, it exhibits notable safety shortcomings. Rece…

Towards Understanding the Safety Boundaries of DeepSeek Models: Evaluation and Findings

2025-03-19 · Zonghao Ying, Guangyi Zheng, Yongxin Huang, Deyue Zhang 외

This study presents the first comprehensive safety evaluation of the DeepSeek models, focusing on evaluating the safety risks associated with their generated content. Our evaluation encompasses DeepSeek's latest generati…

Benchmarking Ethical and Safety Risks of Healthcare LLMs in China-Toward Systemic Governance under Healthy China 2030

2025-05-12 · Mouxiao Bian, Rongzhao Zhang, Chao Ding, Xinwei Peng 외

Large Language Models (LLMs) are poised to transform healthcare under China's Healthy China 2030 initiative, yet they introduce new ethical and patient-safety challenges. We present a novel 12,000-item Q&A benchmark cove…

BenchmarkingEthics

CHiSafetyBench: A Chinese Hierarchical Safety Benchmark for Large Language Models

2024-06-14 · Wenjing Zhang, Xuejiao Lei, Zhaoxiang Liu, Meijuan An 외

With the profound development of large language models(LLMs), their safety concerns have garnered increasing attention. However, there is a scarcity of Chinese safety benchmarks for LLMs, and the existing safety taxonomi…

Multiple-choiceQuestion Answering

ChineseSafe: A Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Safety in Large Language Models

2024-10-24 · Hengxiang Zhang, Hongfu Gao, Qiang Hu, Guanhua Chen 외

With the rapid development of Large language models (LLMs), understanding the capabilities of LLMs in identifying unsafe content has become increasingly important. While previous works have introduced several benchmarks …