paper-with-me

Papers

Same Claim, Different Judgment: Benchmarking Scenario-Induced Bias in Multilingual Financial Misinformation Detection

2026-01-08 · Zhiwei Liu, Yupen Cao, Yuechen Jiang, Mohsinul Kabir, Polydoros Giannouris, Chen Xu, Ziyang Xu, Tianlei Zhu, Md. Tariquzzaman, Triantafillos Papadopoulos, Yan Wang, Lingfei Qian, Xueqing Peng, Zhuohan Xie, Ye Yuan, Saeed Almheiri, Abdulrazzaq Alnajjar, Mingbin Chen, Harry Stuart, Paul Thompson, Prayag Tiwari, Alejandro Lopez-Lira, Xue Liu, Jimin Huang, Sophia Ananiadou arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) have been widely applied across various domains of finance. Since their training data are largely derived from human-authored corpora, LLMs may inherit a range of human biases. Behavioral biases can lead to instability and uncertainty in decision-making, particularly when processing financial information. However, existing research on LLM bias has mainly focused on direct questioning or simplified, general-purpose settings, with limited consideration of the complex real-world financial environments and high-risk, context-sensitive, multilingual financial misinformation detection tasks MFMD. In this work, we propose MFMDScen, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating behavioral biases of LLMs in MFMD across diverse economic scenarios. In collaboration with financial experts, we construct three types of complex financial scenarios: (i) role- and personality-based, (ii) role- and region-based, and (iii) role-based scenarios incorporating ethnicity and religious beliefs. We further develop a multilingual financial misinformation dataset covering English, Chinese, Greek, and Bengali. By integrating these scenarios with misinformation claims, MFMDScen enables a systematic evaluation of 22 mainstream LLMs. Our findings reveal that pronounced behavioral biases persist across both commercial and open-source models. This project is available at https://github.com/lzw108/FMD.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2601.05403

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Sem-Detect: Semantic Level Detection of AI Generated Peer-Reviews

2026-05-20 · André V. Duarte, Brian Tufts, Aditya Oke, Fei Fang 외 arxiv

How can we distinguish whether a peer review was written by a human or generated by an AI model? We argue that, in this setting, authorship should not be attributed solely from the textual features of a review, but also …

Retrieval- and Argumentation-Enhanced Multi-Agent LLMs for Judgmental Forecasting (Extended Version with Supplementary Material)

2025-10-28 · Deniz Gorur, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni arxiv

Judgmental forecasting is the task of making predictions about future events based on human judgment. This task can be seen as a form of claim verification, where the claim corresponds to a future event and the task is t…

Argument Mining

EigenBench: A Comparative Behavioral Measure of Value Alignment

2025-09-02 · Jonathn Chang, Leonhard Piff, Suvadip Sana, Jasmine X. Li 외 arxiv

Aligning AI with human values is a pressing unsolved problem. To address the lack of quantitative metrics for value alignment, we propose EigenBench: a black-box method for comparatively benchmarking language models' val…

Complex Claim Verification with Evidence Retrieved in the Wild

2023-05-19 · Jifan Chen, Grace Kim, Aniruddh Sriram, Greg Durrett 외

Evidence retrieval is a core part of automatic fact-checking. Prior work makes simplifying assumptions in retrieval that depart from real-world use cases: either no access to evidence, access to evidence curated by a hum…

Claim VerificationFact CheckingRetrieval

FactLens: Benchmarking Fine-Grained Fact Verification

2024-11-08 · Kushan Mitra, Dan Zhang, Sajjadur Rahman, Estevam Hruschka

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capability in language generation and understanding, but their tendency to hallucinate and produce factually incorrect information remains a key limitation. To verify LL…

BenchmarkingFact VerificationText Generation