Same Words, Different Meanings: Semantic Polarization in Broadcast Media Language Forecasts Polarization on Social Media Discourse
With the growth of online news over the past decade, empirical studies on political discourse and news consumption have focused on the phenomenon of filter bubbles and echo chambers. Yet recently, scholars have revealed limited evidence around the impact of such phenomenon, leading some to argue that partisan segregation across news audiences cannot be fully explained by online news consumption alone and that the role of traditional legacy media may be as salient in polarizing public discourse around current events. In this work, we expand the scope of analysis to include both online and more traditional media by investigating the relationship between broadcast news media language and social media discourse. By analyzing a decade's worth of closed captions (2 million speaker turns) from CNN and Fox News along with topically corresponding discourse from Twitter, we provide a novel framework for measuring semantic polarization between America's two major broadcast networks to demonstrate how semantic polarization between these outlets has evolved (Study 1), peaked (Study 2) and influenced partisan discussions on Twitter (Study 3) across the last decade. Our results demonstrate a sharp increase in polarization in how topically important keywords are discussed between the two channels, especially after 2016, with overall highest peaks occurring in 2020. The two stations discuss identical topics in drastically distinct contexts in 2020, to the extent that there is barely any linguistic overlap in how identical keywords are contextually discussed. Further, we demonstrate at scale, how such partisan division in broadcast media language significantly shapes semantic polarity trends on Twitter (and vice-versa), empirically linking for the first time, how online discussions are influenced by televised media.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Modeling Personal Biases in Language Use by Inducing Personalized Word Embeddings
There exist biases in individual{'}s language use; the same word (e.g., cool) is used for expressing different meanings (e.g., temperature range) or different words (e.g., cloudy, hazy) are used for describing the same m…
Multi-class ClassificationMulti-Task LearningSentiment AnalysisWord EmbeddingsSemantic Arabic Information Retrieval Framework
The continuous increasing in the amount of the published and stored information requires a special Information Retrieval (IR) frameworks to search and get information accurately and speedily. Currently, keywords-based te…
Information RetrievalRetrievalAn analysis of the semantic shifts of citations
The semantic shifts in natural language is a well established phenomenon and have been studied for many years. Similarly, the meanings of scientific publications may also change as time goes by. In other words, the same …
Using Sentence Embeddings and Semantic Similarity for Seeking Consensus when Assessing Trustworthy AI
Assessing the trustworthiness of artificial intelligence systems requires knowledge from many different disciplines. These disciplines do not necessarily share concepts between them and might use words with different mea…
Semantic SimilaritySemantic Textual SimilaritySentenceSentence EmbeddingsIdentity-sensitive Word Embedding through Heterogeneous Networks
Most existing word embedding approaches do not distinguish the same words in different contexts, therefore ignoring their contextual meanings. As a result, the learned embeddings of these words are usually a mixture of m…
Network Embeddingtext-classificationText ClassificationWord Embeddings+1