paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Sample Complexity Bounds on Differentially Private Learning via Communication Complexity

2014-02-25 · Vitaly Feldman, David Xiao

In this work we analyze the sample complexity of classification by differentially private algorithms. Differential privacy is a strong and well-studied notion of privacy introduced by Dwork et al. (2006) that ensures that the output of an algorithm leaks little information about the data point provided by any of the participating individuals. Sample complexity of private PAC and agnostic learning was studied in a number of prior works starting with (Kasiviswanathan et al., 2008) but a number of basic questions still remain open, most notably whether learning with privacy requires more samples than learning without privacy. We show that the sample complexity of learning with (pure) differential privacy can be arbitrarily higher than the sample complexity of learning without the privacy constraint or the sample complexity of learning with approximate differential privacy. Our second contribution and the main tool is an equivalence between the sample complexity of (pure) differentially private learning of a concept class $C$ (or $SCDP(C)$) and the randomized one-way communication complexity of the evaluation problem for concepts from $C$. Using this equivalence we prove the following bounds: 1. $SCDP(C) = \Omega(LDim(C))$, where $LDim(C)$ is the Littlestone's (1987) dimension characterizing the number of mistakes in the online-mistake-bound learning model. Known bounds on $LDim(C)$ then imply that $SCDP(C)$ can be much higher than the VC-dimension of $C$. 2. For any $t$, there exists a class $C$ such that $LDim(C)=2$ but $SCDP(C) \geq t$. 3. For any $t$, there exists a class $C$ such that the sample complexity of (pure) $\alpha$-differentially private PAC learning is $\Omega(t/\alpha)$ but the sample complexity of the relaxed $(\alpha,\beta)$-differentially private PAC learning is $O(\log(1/\beta)/\alpha)$. This resolves an open problem of Beimel et al. (2013b).

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1402.6278

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

PAC learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Exponential Separations in Local Differential Privacy

2019-07-01 · Matthew Joseph, Jieming Mao, Aaron Roth

We prove a general connection between the communication complexity of two-player games and the sample complexity of their multi-player locally private analogues. We use this connection to prove sample complexity lower bo…

Differentially Private Testing of Identity and Closeness of Discrete Distributions

2017-07-17 · NeurIPS 2018 12 · Jayadev Acharya, Ziteng Sun, Huanyu Zhang

We study the fundamental problems of identity testing (goodness of fit), and closeness testing (two sample test) of distributions over $k$ elements, under differential privacy. While the problems have a long history in s…

Efficient Private Algorithms for Learning Large-Margin Halfspaces

2019-02-24 · Huy L. Nguyen, Jonathan Ullman, Lydia Zakynthinou

We present new differentially private algorithms for learning a large-margin halfspace. In contrast to previous algorithms, which are based on either differentially private simulations of the statistical query model or o…

Efficient, Noise-Tolerant, and Private Learning via Boosting

2020-02-04 · Mark Bun, Marco Leandro Carmosino, Jessica Sorrell

We introduce a simple framework for designing private boosting algorithms. We give natural conditions under which these algorithms are differentially private, efficient, and noise-tolerant PAC learners. To demonstrate ou…

Model-Agnostic Private Learning

2018-12-01 · NeurIPS 2018 12 · Raef Bassily, Abhradeep Guha Thakurta, Om Dipakbhai Thakkar

We design differentially private learning algorithms that are agnostic to the learning model assuming access to limited amount of unlabeled public data. First, we give a new differentially private algorithm for answering…

General ClassificationmodelTransfer Learning