paper-with-me

Papers

Sample-efficient proper PAC learning with approximate differential privacy

2020-12-07 · Badih Ghazi, Noah Golowich, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi

In this paper we prove that the sample complexity of properly learning a class of Littlestone dimension $d$ with approximate differential privacy is $\tilde O(d^6)$, ignoring privacy and accuracy parameters. This result answers a question of Bun et al. (FOCS 2020) by improving upon their upper bound of $2^{O(d)}$ on the sample complexity. Prior to our work, finiteness of the sample complexity for privately learning a class of finite Littlestone dimension was only known for improper private learners, and the fact that our learner is proper answers another question of Bun et al., which was also asked by Bousquet et al. (NeurIPS 2020). Using machinery developed by Bousquet et al., we then show that the sample complexity of sanitizing a binary hypothesis class is at most polynomial in its Littlestone dimension and dual Littlestone dimension. This implies that a class is sanitizable if and only if it has finite Littlestone dimension. An important ingredient of our proofs is a new property of binary hypothesis classes that we call irreducibility, which may be of independent interest.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2012.03893

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

PAC learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Differentially Private Release and Learning of Threshold Functions

2015-04-28 · Mark Bun, Kobbi Nissim, Uri Stemmer, Salil Vadhan

We prove new upper and lower bounds on the sample complexity of $(\epsilon, \delta)$ differentially private algorithms for releasing approximate answers to threshold functions. A threshold function $c_x$ over a totally o…

PAC learning

Private Learning and Sanitization: Pure vs. Approximate Differential Privacy

2014-07-10 · Amos Beimel, Kobbi Nissim, Uri Stemmer

We compare the sample complexity of private learning [Kasiviswanathan et al. 2008] and sanitization~[Blum et al. 2008] under pure $\epsilon$-differential privacy [Dwork et al. TCC 2006] and approximate $(\epsilon,\delta)…

ABCDP: Approximate Bayesian Computation with Differential Privacy

2019-10-11 · Mijung Park, Margarita Vinaroz, Wittawat Jitkrittum

We develop a novel approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) framework, ABCDP, that produces differentially private (DP) and approximate posterior samples. Our framework takes advantage of the Sparse Vector Technique (SVT),…

Privacy Preserving

Max-Information, Differential Privacy, and Post-Selection Hypothesis Testing

2016-04-13 · Ryan Rogers, Aaron Roth, Adam Smith, Om Thakkar

In this paper, we initiate a principled study of how the generalization properties of approximate differential privacy can be used to perform adaptive hypothesis testing, while giving statistically valid $p$-value correc…

Two-sample testingvalid

Auditing Approximate Machine Unlearning for Differentially Private Models

2025-08-26 · Yuechun Gu, Jiajie He, Keke Chen arxiv

Approximate machine unlearning aims to remove the effect of specific data from trained models to ensure individuals' privacy. Existing methods focus on the removed records and assume the retained ones are unaffected. How…

Data Augmentation