paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Scaling Fair Learning to Hundreds of Intersectional Groups

2021-09-29 · Eric Zhao, De-An Huang, Hao liu, Zhiding Yu, Anqi Liu, Olga Russakovsky, Anima Anandkumar

Bias mitigation algorithms aim to reduce the performance disparity between different protected groups. Existing techniques focus on settings where there is a small number of protected groups arising from a single protected attribute, such as skin color, gender or age. In real-world applications, however, there are multiple protected attributes yielding a large number of intersectional protected groups. These intersectional groups are particularly prone to severe underrepresentation in datasets. We conduct the first thorough empirical analysis of how existing bias mitigation methods scale to this setting, using large-scale datasets including the ImageNet People Subtree and CelebA. We find that as more protected attributes are introduced to a task, it becomes more important to leverage the protected attribute labels during training to promote fairness. We also find that the use of knowledge distillation, in conjunction with group-specific models, can help scale existing fair learning methods to hundreds of protected intersectional groups and reduce bias. We show on ImageNet's People Subtree that combining these insights can further reduce the bias amplification of fair learning algorithms by 15% ---a surprising reduction given that the dataset has 196 protected groups but fewer than 10% of the training dataset has protected attribute labels.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

AttributeFairnessKnowledge Distillation

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Intersectional Two-sided Fairness in Recommendation

2024-02-05 · Yifan Wang, Peijie Sun, Weizhi Ma, Min Zhang 외

Fairness of recommender systems (RS) has attracted increasing attention recently. Based on the involved stakeholders, the fairness of RS can be divided into user fairness, item fairness, and two-sided fairness which cons…

FairnessRecommendation Systems

MESD: A Risk-Sensitive Metric for Explanation Fairness Across Intersectional Subgroups

2026-03-13 · Gideon Popoola, John Sheppard arxiv

Fairness in machine learning is predominantly evaluated through outcome-oriented metrics, such as Demographic parity, which measure whether predictions are statistically consistent across protected groups. However, these…

Synthetic Data Generation for Intersectional Fairness by Leveraging Hierarchical Group Structure

2024-05-23 · Gaurav Maheshwari, Aurélien Bellet, Pascal Denis, Mikaela Keller

In this paper, we introduce a data augmentation approach specifically tailored to enhance intersectional fairness in classification tasks. Our method capitalizes on the hierarchical structure inherent to intersectionalit…

Data AugmentationFairnessSynthetic Data Generation

The Intersectionality Problem for Algorithmic Fairness

2024-11-04 · Johannes Himmelreich, Arbie Hsu, Kristian Lum, Ellen Veomett

A yet unmet challenge in algorithmic fairness is the problem of intersectionality, that is, achieving fairness across the intersection of multiple groups -- and verifying that such fairness has been attained. Because int…

Fairness

Fair Without Leveling Down: A New Intersectional Fairness Definition

2023-05-21 · Gaurav Maheshwari, Aurélien Bellet, Pascal Denis, Mikaela Keller

In this work, we consider the problem of intersectional group fairness in the classification setting, where the objective is to learn discrimination-free models in the presence of several intersecting sensitive groups. F…

Fairness