Scheming in the wild: detecting real-world AI scheming incidents with open-source intelligence
Scheming, the covert pursuit of misaligned goals by AI systems, represents a potentially catastrophic risk, yet scheming research suffers from significant limitations. In particular, scheming evaluations demonstrate behaviours that may not occur in real-world settings, limiting scientific understanding, hindering policy development, and not enabling real-time detection of loss of control incidents. Real-world evidence is needed, but current monitoring techniques are not effective for this purpose. This paper introduces a novel open-source intelligence (OSINT) methodology for detecting real-world scheming incidents: collecting and analysing transcripts from chatbot conversations or command-line interactions shared online. Analysing over 183,420 transcripts from X (formerly Twitter), we identify 698 real-world scheming-related incidents between October 2025 and March 2026. We observe a statistically significant 4.9x increase in monthly incidents from the first to last month, compared to a 1.7x increase in posts discussing scheming. We find evidence of multiple scheming-related behaviours in real-world deployments previously reported only in experiments, many resulting in real-world harms. While we did not detect catastrophic scheming incidents, the behaviours observed demonstrate concerning precursors, such as willingness to disregard instructions, circumvent safeguards, lie to users, and single-mindedly pursue goals in harmful ways. As AI systems become more capable, these could evolve into more strategic scheming with potentially catastrophic consequences. Our findings demonstrate the viability of transcript-based OSINT as a scalable approach to real-world scheming detection supporting scientific research, policy development, and emergency response. We recommend further investment towards OSINT techniques for monitoring scheming and loss of control.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Evaluating and Understanding Scheming Propensity in LLM Agents
As frontier language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents pursuing complex, long-term objectives, there is increased risk of scheming: agents covertly pursuing misaligned goals. Prior work has focused on…
SchemeArena: Factorized Stress Testing of Scheming in LLM Agents
We study scheming in LLM agents, in which agents covertly pursue misaligned goals. Our focus is to understand how scheming arises from the interaction of key factors, such as instrumental goals, environmental affordances…
Realistic honeypot evaluations for scheming propensity
We introduce scheming honeypot evaluations, a framework for testing whether models will pursue instrumental goals if given the opportunity. Our scheming honeypot evaluations take the form of coding tasks in Google's alig…
Constitutional Black-Box Monitoring for Scheming in LLM Agents
Safe deployment of Large Language Model (LLM) agents in autonomous settings requires reliable oversight mechanisms. A central challenge is detecting scheming, where agents covertly pursue misaligned goals. One approach t…
Evaluating Frontier Models for Stealth and Situational Awareness
Recent work has demonstrated the plausibility of frontier AI models scheming -- knowingly and covertly pursuing an objective misaligned with its developer's intentions. Such behavior could be very hard to detect, and if …