SciDTB: Discourse Dependency TreeBank for Scientific Abstracts
Annotation corpus for discourse relations benefits NLP tasks such as machine translation and question answering. In this paper, we present SciDTB, a domain-specific discourse treebank annotated on scientific articles. Different from widely-used RST-DT and PDTB, SciDTB uses dependency trees to represent discourse structure, which is flexible and simplified to some extent but do not sacrifice structural integrity. We discuss the labeling framework, annotation workflow and some statistics about SciDTB. Furthermore, our treebank is made as a benchmark for evaluating discourse dependency parsers, on which we provide several baselines as fundamental work.
Code (1)
Tasks
ArticlesMachine TranslationQuestion AnsweringTranslationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Do sentence embeddings capture discourse properties of sentences from Scientific Abstracts ?
We introduce four tasks designed to determine which sentence encoders best capture discourse properties of sentences from scientific abstracts, namely coherence and cohesion between clauses of a sentence, and discourse r…
SentenceSentence EmbeddingsUsing lexical and Dependency Features to Disambiguate Discourse Connectives in Hindi
Discourse parsing is a challenging task in NLP and plays a crucial role in discourse analysis. To enable discourse analysis for Hindi, Hindi Discourse Relations Bank was created on a subset of Hindi TreeBank. The benefit…
Discourse ParsingQuestion AnsweringJoint Syntacto-Discourse Parsing and the Syntacto-Discourse Treebank
Discourse parsing has long been treated as a stand-alone problem independent from constituency or dependency parsing. Most attempts at this problem are pipelined rather than end-to-end, sophisticated, and not self-contai…
Dependency ParsingDiscourse Parsing