paper-with-me

Papers

SECRETS: Subject-Efficient Clinical Randomized Controlled Trials using Synthetic Intervention

2023-05-08 · Sayeri Lala, Niraj K. Jha

The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard for estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) of a medical intervention but requires 100s-1000s of subjects, making it expensive and difficult to implement. While a cross-over trial can reduce sample size requirements by measuring the treatment effect per individual, it is only applicable to chronic conditions and interventions whose effects dissipate rapidly. Another approach is to replace or augment data collected from an RCT with external data from prospective studies or prior RCTs, but it is vulnerable to confounders in the external or augmented data. We propose to simulate the cross-over trial to overcome its practical limitations while exploiting its strengths. We propose a novel framework, SECRETS, which, for the first time, estimates the individual treatment effect (ITE) per patient in the RCT study without using any external data by leveraging a state-of-the-art counterfactual estimation algorithm, called synthetic intervention. It also uses a new hypothesis testing strategy to determine whether the treatment has a clinically significant ATE based on the estimated ITEs. We show that SECRETS can improve the power of an RCT while maintaining comparable significance levels; in particular, on three real-world clinical RCTs (Phase-3 trials), SECRETS increases power over the baseline method by $\boldsymbol{6}$-$\boldsymbol{54\%}$ (average: 21.5%, standard deviation: 15.8%).

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2305.05078

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

counterfactual

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

METRIK: Measurement-Efficient Randomized Controlled Trials using Transformers with Input Masking

2024-06-24 · Sayeri Lala, Niraj K. Jha

Clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) collect hundreds of measurements spanning various metric types (e.g., laboratory tests, cognitive/motor assessments, etc.) across 100s-1000s of subjects to evaluate the effect…

Imputation

Machine Learning Assisted Adjustment Boosts Efficiency of Exact Inference in Randomized Controlled Trials

2024-03-05 · Han Yu, Alan D. Hutson, Xiaoyi Ma

In this work, we proposed a novel inferential procedure assisted by machine learning based adjustment for randomized control trials. The method was developed under the Rosenbaum's framework of exact tests in randomized e…

Towards Understanding of Medical Randomized Controlled Trials by Conclusion Generation

2019-10-03 · WS 2019 11 · Alexander Te-Wei Shieh, Yung-Sung Chuang, Shang-Yu Su, Yun-Nung Chen

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represent the paramount evidence of clinical medicine. Using machines to interpret the massive amount of RCTs has the potential of aiding clinical decision-making. We propose a RCT con…

Decision MakingLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingSentence+1

Automated causal inference in application to randomized controlled clinical trials

2022-01-15 · Jiqing Wu, Nanda Horeweg, Marco de Bruyn, Remi A. Nout 외

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered as the gold standard for testing causal hypotheses in the clinical domain. However, the investigation of prognostic variables of patient outcome in a hypothesized cause-…

Causal Inference

Towards Regulatory-Confirmed Adaptive Clinical Trials: Machine Learning Opportunities and Solutions

2025-03-12 · Omer Noy Klein, Alihan Hüyük, Ron Shamir, Uri Shalit 외

Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating the effect of new medical treatments. Treatments must pass stringent regulatory conditions in order to be approved for widespread use, yet even aft…

Active Learning