SECRETS: Subject-Efficient Clinical Randomized Controlled Trials using Synthetic Intervention
The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard for estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) of a medical intervention but requires 100s-1000s of subjects, making it expensive and difficult to implement. While a cross-over trial can reduce sample size requirements by measuring the treatment effect per individual, it is only applicable to chronic conditions and interventions whose effects dissipate rapidly. Another approach is to replace or augment data collected from an RCT with external data from prospective studies or prior RCTs, but it is vulnerable to confounders in the external or augmented data. We propose to simulate the cross-over trial to overcome its practical limitations while exploiting its strengths. We propose a novel framework, SECRETS, which, for the first time, estimates the individual treatment effect (ITE) per patient in the RCT study without using any external data by leveraging a state-of-the-art counterfactual estimation algorithm, called synthetic intervention. It also uses a new hypothesis testing strategy to determine whether the treatment has a clinically significant ATE based on the estimated ITEs. We show that SECRETS can improve the power of an RCT while maintaining comparable significance levels; in particular, on three real-world clinical RCTs (Phase-3 trials), SECRETS increases power over the baseline method by $\boldsymbol{6}$-$\boldsymbol{54\%}$ (average: 21.5%, standard deviation: 15.8%).
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
counterfactualSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
METRIK: Measurement-Efficient Randomized Controlled Trials using Transformers with Input Masking
Clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) collect hundreds of measurements spanning various metric types (e.g., laboratory tests, cognitive/motor assessments, etc.) across 100s-1000s of subjects to evaluate the effect…
ImputationMachine Learning Assisted Adjustment Boosts Efficiency of Exact Inference in Randomized Controlled Trials
In this work, we proposed a novel inferential procedure assisted by machine learning based adjustment for randomized control trials. The method was developed under the Rosenbaum's framework of exact tests in randomized e…
Towards Understanding of Medical Randomized Controlled Trials by Conclusion Generation
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represent the paramount evidence of clinical medicine. Using machines to interpret the massive amount of RCTs has the potential of aiding clinical decision-making. We propose a RCT con…
Decision MakingLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingSentence+1Automated causal inference in application to randomized controlled clinical trials
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered as the gold standard for testing causal hypotheses in the clinical domain. However, the investigation of prognostic variables of patient outcome in a hypothesized cause-…
Causal InferenceTowards Regulatory-Confirmed Adaptive Clinical Trials: Machine Learning Opportunities and Solutions
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating the effect of new medical treatments. Treatments must pass stringent regulatory conditions in order to be approved for widespread use, yet even aft…
Active Learning