paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Seed-Prover: Deep and Broad Reasoning for Automated Theorem Proving

2025-07-31 · Luoxin Chen, Jinming Gu, Liankai Huang, Wenhao Huang, Zhicheng Jiang, Allan Jie, Xiaoran Jin, Xing Jin, Chenggang Li, Kaijing Ma, Cheng Ren, Jiawei Shen, Wenlei Shi, Tong Sun, He Sun, Jiahui Wang, Siran Wang, Zhihong Wang, Chenrui Wei, Shufa Wei, Yonghui Wu, Yuchen Wu, Yihang Xia, Huajian Xin, Fan Yang, Huaiyuan Ying, Hongyi Yuan, Zheng Yuan, Tianyang Zhan, Chi Zhang, Yue Zhang, Ge Zhang, Tianyun Zhao, Jianqiu Zhao, Yichi Zhou, Thomas Hanwen Zhu arxiv

LLMs have demonstrated strong mathematical reasoning abilities by leveraging reinforcement learning with long chain-of-thought, yet they continue to struggle with theorem proving due to the lack of clear supervision signals when solely using natural language. Dedicated domain-specific languages like Lean provide clear supervision via formal verification of proofs, enabling effective training through reinforcement learning. In this work, we propose \textbf{Seed-Prover}, a lemma-style whole-proof reasoning model. Seed-Prover can iteratively refine its proof based on Lean feedback, proved lemmas, and self-summarization. To solve IMO-level contest problems, we design three test-time inference strategies that enable both deep and broad reasoning. Seed-Prover proves $78.1\%$ of formalized past IMO problems, saturates MiniF2F, and achieves over 50\% on PutnamBench, outperforming the previous state-of-the-art by a large margin. To address the lack of geometry support in Lean, we introduce a geometry reasoning engine \textbf{Seed-Geometry}, which outperforms previous formal geometry engines. We use these two systems to participate in IMO 2025 and fully prove 5 out of 6 problems. This work represents a significant advancement in automated mathematical reasoning, demonstrating the effectiveness of formal verification with long chain-of-thought reasoning.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2507.23726

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Automated Theorem ProvingReinforcement LearningMathematical Reasoning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

HOList: An Environment for Machine Learning of Higher-Order Theorem Proving

2019-04-05 · Kshitij Bansal, Sarah M. Loos, Markus N. Rabe, Christian Szegedy 외

We present an environment, benchmark, and deep learning driven automated theorem prover for higher-order logic. Higher-order interactive theorem provers enable the formalization of arbitrary mathematical theories and the…

Automated Theorem ProvingBIG-bench Machine LearningDeep LearningDeep Reinforcement Learning+3

MATP-BENCH: Can MLLM Be a Good Automated Theorem Prover for Multimodal Problems?

2025-06-06 · Zhitao He, Zongwei Lyu, Dazhong Chen, Dadi Guo 외

Numerous theorems, such as those in geometry, are often presented in multimodal forms (e.g., diagrams). Humans benefit from visual reasoning in such settings, using diagrams to gain intuition and guide the proof process.…

Automated Theorem ProvingVisual Reasoning

EvolProver: Advancing Automated Theorem Proving by Evolving Formalized Problems via Symmetry and Difficulty

2025-10-01 · Yuchen Tian, Ruiyuan Huang, Xuanwu Wang, Jing Ma 외 arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) for formal theorem proving have shown significant promise, yet they often lack generalizability and are fragile to even minor transformations of problem statements. To address this limitation…

Automated Theorem ProvingData Augmentation

Proceedings 19th International Workshop on the ACL2 Theorem Prover and Its Applications

2025-07-24 · Ruben Gamboa, Panagiotis Manolios arxiv

The ACL2 Workshop series is the major technical forum for users of the ACL2 theorem proving system to present research related to the ACL2 theorem prover and its applications. ACL2 is an industrial-strength automated rea…

Using ConceptNet to Teach Common Sense to an Automated Theorem Prover

2019-12-30 · Claudia Schon, Sophie Siebert, Frieder Stolzenburg

The CoRg system is a system to solve commonsense reasoning problems. The core of the CoRg system is the automated theorem prover Hyper that is fed with large amounts of background knowledge. This background knowledge pla…

Common Sense ReasoningKnowledge Graphs